Journal article

The Nature of Voice Voting. Lessons from a Case Study

Pages 145 to 165

Cite this article


  • Urfalino, P.
(2017). The Nature of Voice Voting. Lessons From a Case Study. Négociations, No 27(1), 145-165. https://doi.org/10.3917/neg.027.0145.

  • Urfalino, Philippe.
« The Nature of Voice Voting. Lessons from a Case Study ». Négociations, 2017/1 No 27, 2017. p.145-165. CAIRN.INFO, shs.cairn.info/journal-negociations-2017-1-page-145?lang=en.

  • URFALINO, Philippe,
2017. The Nature of Voice Voting. Lessons from a Case Study. Négociations, 2017/1 No 27, p.145-165. DOI : 10.3917/neg.027.0145. URL : https://shs.cairn.info/journal-negociations-2017-1-page-145?lang=en.

https://doi.org/10.3917/neg.027.0145


English

Building on a detailed study of debates and votes of contemporary expert committees, this article supports a hypothesis based on voting practices in the Middle Ages and under the French Old Regime: that the voice vote is a specific decision method. These distinctive properties show that it is not like any other voting.

Keywords

  • collective decision-making
  • voice voting
  • history of electoral practices
  • expert committees
  • Bentham

Publisher keywords: Bentham, collective decision-making, expert committees, history of electoral practices, voice voting

This article is available in conditional access

Cairn Pro Management - Journals

From €25 per month

300 full-text journals at the heart of your profession
Already subscribed to Cairn Pro? Member of a client institution?