Multitudes 2015/4 No 61
Journal article

Populist Devices and Mediarchic Regimes: Nine Hippotheses

Pages 88 to 94

Cite this article

  • CITTON, Yves,
2015. Populist Devices and Mediarchic Regimes: Nine Hippotheses. Multitudes, 2015/4 No 61, p.88-94. DOI : 10.3917/mult.061.0088. URL : https://shs.cairn.info/journal-multitudes-2015-4-page-88?lang=en.
  • Citton, Yves.
« Populist Devices and Mediarchic Regimes: Nine Hippotheses ». Multitudes, 2015/4 No 61, 2015. p.88-94. CAIRN.INFO, shs.cairn.info/journal-multitudes-2015-4-page-88?lang=en.
  • Citton, Y.
(2015). Populist Devices and Mediarchic Regimes: Nine Hippotheses. Multitudes, No 61(4), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.061.0088.

https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.061.0088

Abstract
Authors

Cite this article

  • Citton, Y.
(2015). Populist Devices and Mediarchic Regimes: Nine Hippotheses. Multitudes, No 61(4), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.061.0088.
  • Citton, Yves.
« Populist Devices and Mediarchic Regimes: Nine Hippotheses ». Multitudes, 2015/4 No 61, 2015. p.88-94. CAIRN.INFO, shs.cairn.info/journal-multitudes-2015-4-page-88?lang=en.
  • CITTON, Yves,
2015. Populist Devices and Mediarchic Regimes: Nine Hippotheses. Multitudes, 2015/4 No 61, p.88-94. DOI : 10.3917/mult.061.0088. URL : https://shs.cairn.info/journal-multitudes-2015-4-page-88?lang=en.

https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.061.0088

French
Español
English

Populist discourses are usually described as perversions of democratic procedures, but they should rather be interpreted as symptoms of the mediarchic nature of our political regimes. The article rides over nine “hippotheses” which consider populisms as mass-mediatic effects which fuel the perversions they pretend to denounce.

Uploaded: 12/30/2015

https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.061.0088

This article is available in conditional access

Subscribe to Cairn Pro

Starting at €18 per month

170 full-text journals at the heart of your profession
Already subscribed to Cairn Pro? Member of a client institution?