Journal article

Lévia...Tot(h)

On the Subject of Ernesto Neto’s Leviathan-Toth

Pages 155 to 169

Cite this article


  • Alliez, É.
  • and Bonne, J.-C.
(2008). Lévia...tot(h) on the Subject of Ernesto Neto’s Leviathan-Toth. Multitudes, No 33(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.033.0155.

  • Alliez, Éric.
  • et al.
« Lévia...Tot(h) : On the Subject of Ernesto Neto’s Leviathan-Toth ». Multitudes, 2008/2 No 33, 2008. p.155-169. CAIRN.INFO, shs.cairn.info/journal-multitudes-2008-2-page-155?lang=en.

  • ALLIEZ, Éric
  • and BONNE, Jean-Claude,
2008. Lévia...Tot(h) On the Subject of Ernesto Neto’s Leviathan-Toth. Multitudes, 2008/2 No 33, p.155-169. DOI : 10.3917/mult.033.0155. URL : https://shs.cairn.info/journal-multitudes-2008-2-page-155?lang=en.

https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.033.0155


English

Leviathan-Toth, Ernesto Neto’s anti/counter-installation which could be seen hanging from the vaults of the Panthéon in autumn 2006 does not seek to exploit this national memorial as a space in which to stand as an exhibition (environmental art). It responds to all of its surrounding factors – physical, aesthetic, political, and metaphysical, to attack the representative art whose constitutive-constitutional role in the republic, according to Hobbes, can be seen in Leviathan’s frontispiece. Setting up a sort of Critique et Clinique of Representation in all senses of the term beginning with the short-circuit (which is also the shortest circuit) between politics and aesthetics, Neto’s operation sets its sights on the expansive dis- organisation of the multitude living under the «democratic» regime of contractual representation of which the Panthéon is the temple. It provides a body for the rhizomatic-bioenergetic perversion of the Image of the State-Machine, of the Form-State, by projecting a new infra and supra-organic type of reality which draws its «energy» from the forces of the multitudo dissoluta (Hobbes) whose radical and vital recomposition it advocates. This work or non-work, derived from a Brazilian political-aesthetic constructivism which is undergoing redefinition, can now only take place in the context of a practice of displacement which incorporates and is constituted of the spectator-participant.

This article is available in conditional access

Subscribe to Cairn Pro

Starting at €18 per month

170 full-text journals at the heart of your profession
Already subscribed to Cairn Pro? Member of a client institution?