Journal article

Algorithms Have Reasons Behavior Ignores

Pages 112 to 123

Cite this article


  • Reigeluth, T.
(2016). Algorithms Have Reasons Behavior Ignores. Multitudes, No 62(1), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.062.0112.

  • Reigeluth, Tyler.
« Algorithms Have Reasons Behavior Ignores ». Multitudes, 2016/1 No 62, 2016. p.112-123. CAIRN.INFO, shs.cairn.info/journal-multitudes-2016-1-page-112?lang=en.

  • REIGELUTH, Tyler,
2016. Algorithms Have Reasons Behavior Ignores. Multitudes, 2016/1 No 62, p.112-123. DOI : 10.3917/mult.062.0112. URL : https://shs.cairn.info/journal-multitudes-2016-1-page-112?lang=en.

https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.062.0112


English

The present contribution seeks to reconsider some of the fundamental stakes underlying machine-learning. The question of « behavior » will be problematized in light of Gilbert Simondon’s theory of the image cycle. By taking theoretical positions and technical ambitions in the field of machine-learning seriously, we suggest to frame the transformations of algorithmics in terms of two ideal-types: mechanical and behavioral. While taking care to avoid any binary opposition, we treat these two poles as successive structurations, phases of existence that transform the nature of the problem to be resolved, that operate a passage from one structure to another. Following Simondon, we qualify this passage as transductive so as to sketch an image of behavior that calls for a reinventing of our political and ethical frameworks. What if the question were: what collective is eventuated, or do we wish to eventuate, when we behave with algorithms?

This article is available in conditional access

Subscribe to Cairn Pro

Starting at €18 per month

170 full-text journals at the heart of your profession
Already subscribed to Cairn Pro? Member of a client institution?