Copy and Paste
Translated from the French by Cadenza Academic Translations
Pages 310 to 333
Cite this article
- MERZEAU, Louise,
- Merzeau, Louise.
- Merzeau, L.
https://doi.org/10.3917/mediu.032.0310
Cite this article
- Merzeau, L.
- Merzeau, Louise.
- MERZEAU, Louise,
https://doi.org/10.3917/mediu.032.0310
Notes
-
[1]
Guillaume Champeau, “Google ne dira plus où se trouvent les réponses, il répondra.” Numerama, last modified March 15, 2012, http://www.numerama.com/magazine/22022-google-ne-dira-plus-ou-se-trouvent-les-reponses-il-repondra.html.
-
[2]
Nicole Boubée, “Le rôle des copiés-collés dans l’activité de recherche d’information des élèves au secondaire,” last modified September 1, 2008,: http://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_00344161/en/.
-
[3]
Lionel Maurel, ::S.I.Lex::, last modified June 5, 2011, http://scinfolex.wordpress.com/tag/copydown/.
- [4]
-
[5]
Franck Rebillard and Nikos Smyrnaios, “L’information via Google: Les relations entre éditeurs de presse et infomédiaires sur l’Internet.” Online Services Symposium, 2007, University of Paris XI.
-
[6]
Marc-Olivier Goyette-Côté, “Le retraitement automatisé de l’information d’actualité en ligne: analyse des mécanismes sociotechniques mis en place par les infomédiaires,” Communication, Vol.29/2(2012).
-
[7]
Franck Rebillard, “Du traitement de l’information à son retraitement. La publication de l’information sur l’Internet,” Réseaux 137 (2006).
-
[8]
Jean-Michel Salaün, “Les trois dimensions de l’économie du document,” Documentaliste-Sciences de l’Information, vol.48 (2011): 24—27.
-
[9]
Hubert Guillaud, “Les trois dimensions de l’économie de la publication,” La Feuille, last modified September 13, 2011, http://lafeuille.blog.lemonde.fr/2011/09/13/les-trois-dimensions-de-leconomie-de-la-publication/.
-
[10]
Olivier Ertzscheid, “Le Web: en lettres capital,” Affordance.info, last modified March 30, 2012, http://affordance.typepad.com/mon_weblog/2012/03/le-web-en-lettres-capital.html.
-
[11]
Jacques Perriault, “Effet diligence, effet serendip et autres défis pour les sciences de l’information.” Accessed online from: http://perso.limsi.fr/Individu/turner/DCP/Paris2OOO/Perriault.pdf.
-
[12]
Michel de Certeau, L’invention du quotidien 1: Arts de Faire, UGE, Collection “10/18”, 1980.
-
[13]
André Gunthert, “Internet est une révolution de la consultation plus que de la production,” interview with Hubert Guillaud, last modified February 3, 2010, http://www.internetactu.net/2010/02/03/andre-gunthert-internet-est-une-revolution-de-la-consultation-plus-que-de-la-production/.
-
[14]
André Gunthert, “L’oeuvre d’art à l’ère de son appropriabilité numérique,” last modified November 14, 2011, Accessed from: http://culturevisuelle.org/icones/2191.
-
[15]
In July 2011, HADOPI (in English, the High Authority for the Transmission of Creative works and Copyright Protection on the Internet) said it had received more than 18 million reports in nine months from societies acting on behalf of authors and artists (SCPP, SACEM, etc.), or 75,000 referrals per day.
-
[16]
Frédéric Kaplan, “La tentation de l’encyclopédisme,”, last modified June 27, 2011. http://fkaplan.wordpress.com/2011/06/27/la-tentation-de-lencyclopedisme/.
-
[17]
Steven Berlin Johnson, “The Glass Box and the Commonplace Book”, last modified April 23, 2010, http://www.stevenberlinjohnson.com/2010/04/the-glass-box-and-the-commonplace-book.html.
-
[18]
Cf. Olivier Ertzscheid, “L’homme est un document comme les autres,” Hermès 53 (2009): 33—40.
-
[19]
With the closure of “Megaupload,” a large quantity of material became inaccessible. It had been assembled and shared by Internet users and was not available from the creative industries.
-
[20]
Olivier Ertzscheid, “Le jour où YouTube fermera,” Ecrans.fr, last modified February 14, 2012,http://www.ecrans.fr/Le-jour-ou-YouTube-fermera,14081.html.
-
[21]
Virginie Pringuet, “La conquête de la liberté de panorama,” Atlasmuseum, last modified March 10, 2012, http://atlasmuseum.hypotheses.org/17
-
[22]
For more on this copy-party organized in March 2012 by Olivier Ertzscheid, Silvère Mercier and Lionel Maurel at the library in La Roche-sur-Yon, see below, 414.
-
[23]
Lionel Maurel, “L’INA sur YouTube: le bien et le mieux,”::S.I.Lex::, last modified March 29, 2012, http://scinfolex.wordpress.com.
-
[24]
Emmanuel Cauvin, “Révolution dans la nouvelle cité électronique,” Le Débat no.167 (2011): 155.
Now is the moment to rehabilitate the copy and paste phenomenon as the paradigm of the new mediological age. As we are still caught in the logic of the graphosphere, we find it difficult to accept and prefer to point the finger at those whose actions are foolish or reprehensible. However, we will save none of that which we fear we may lose merely by refusing to consider the complexity and the scale of the phenomenon or by refusing to see that, while it is currently casting everything into doubt, it may also be the remedy we need…
According to recent studies, 92 percent of 15—17 year olds have a Facebook account, 83 percent of 11—13 year olds download music regularly (and illegally), and 44 percent download films or TV series. Amongst the student population, even if they do not all commit plagiarism, the great majority still do not really understand why plagiarism is not permitted. Some may rapidly conclude from these figures that this is a matter of piracy, digital sociability, and copy and pasting. However, these actions do not all carry the same significance. To download is to intend to use material: to listen, watch, share, comment or remix. It is consumption in the form of appropriation and socialization. In a bid to ensure peer approval, the young Internet user is looking to share material that bypasses the vertical transmission of the adult world. On the other hand, with academic plagiarism, there is no appropriation: to copy is merely the shortcut to producing something that corresponds to their teachers’ expectations…
This article is available in conditional access
Buy this article
€2.00