Journal article

Is platforming compatible with the exercise of discretionary power?

Pages 81 to 92

Cite this article


  • Decamp, A.
(2021). Is Platforming Compatible With the Exercise of Discretionary Power? Les Politiques Sociales, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.3917/lps.213.0081.

  • Decamp, André.
« Is platforming compatible with the exercise of discretionary power? ». Les Politiques Sociales, 2021/3, 2021. p.81-92. CAIRN.INFO, shs.cairn.info/journal-les-politiques-sociales-2021-3-page-81?lang=en.

  • DECAMP, André,
2021. Is platforming compatible with the exercise of discretionary power? Les Politiques Sociales, 2021/3, p.81-92. DOI : 10.3917/lps.213.0081. URL : https://shs.cairn.info/journal-les-politiques-sociales-2021-3-page-81?lang=en.

https://doi.org/10.3917/lps.213.0081


English

The implementation of the Public Action 2022 programme highlights the redefinition of social protection and of the State’s relations with users, through the dematerialisation of public services. A recomposition of discretionary power is taking place with the push for complete digitisation of public services. Social work agents see their discretionary power caught between big data and the platformisation of public services. For social work officials, what is the effect of this platformisation and big data on their ability to act, their control practices and their decision making ? The draft government programme Public Action 2022 provides an opportunity to explore the answers to these questions and to analyse the current place of the user, the notions of digital challenges and the gradual shift in the notion of “risk”.

This article is available in conditional access

Subscribe to Cairn Pro

Starting at €18 per month

170 full-text journals at the heart of your profession
Already subscribed to Cairn Pro? Member of a client institution?