Journal article

The Choice and Role of Expert Witnesses

Pages 33 to 36

Cite this article


  • Bertella-Geffroy, M.-O.
(2012). The Choice and Role of Expert Witnesses. Hermès, La Revue, No 64(3), 33-36. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/48378.

  • Bertella-Geffroy, Marie-Odile.
« The Choice and Role of Expert Witnesses ». Hermès, La Revue, 2012/3 No 64, 2012. p.33-36. CAIRN.INFO, shs.cairn.info/journal-hermes-la-revue-2012-3-page-33?lang=en.

  • BERTELLA-GEFFROY, Marie-Odile,
2012. The Choice and Role of Expert Witnesses. Hermès, La Revue, 2012/3 No 64, p.33-36. DOI : 10.4267/2042/48378. URL : https://shs.cairn.info/journal-hermes-la-revue-2012-3-page-33?lang=en.

https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/48378


English

Expert appraisals are often crucial in legal proceedings concerning liability in matters of public health. Experts are required to reconstruct facts or to appraise the work of colleagues who act in an advisory capacity to policy-makers, in order to establish whether the quality of the expert studies and advice provided have been adequate to the importance of the health issues. In France, expert witnesses have an official status subject to a regulated procedure that includes specific and regular audits. Although this procedure clearly identifies the competences of court-appointed experts, it is far too lengthy and cumbersome for researchers to gain access to this status. Clearer procedures capable of distinguishing expert appraisals from lobbying also need to be established.

Keywords

  • expert witness
  • public health
  • public health disaster

Publisher keywords: expert witness, public health, public health disaster

This article is available in conditional access

Cairn Pro Management - Journals

From €25 per month

300 full-text journals at the heart of your profession
Already subscribed to Cairn Pro? Member of a client institution?