Transformations in Sentencing and Penalty Enforcement
Pages 487 to 504
Cite this article
- KAMINSKI, Dan,
- SNACKEN, Sonia
- and VAN DE KERCHOVE, Michel,
- Kaminski, Dan.,
- et al.
- Kaminski, D.,
- Snacken, S.
- and Van de Kerchove, M.
https://doi.org/10.3917/ds.314.0487
Cite this article
- Kaminski, D.,
- Snacken, S.
- and Van de Kerchove, M.
- Kaminski, Dan.,
- et al.
- KAMINSKI, Dan,
- SNACKEN, Sonia
- and VAN DE KERCHOVE, Michel,
https://doi.org/10.3917/ds.314.0487
Starting from the Belgian criminal justice system, we propose to examine six important transformations: defining the penal sanction is more difficult than ever (1) and sanctions and measures are increasingly diverse (2), a feature which also leads to an increasing diversity of the penal aims (3). At the procedural level, trends in (de)judicialisation and juridicalisation (4), combined with the diversification of the sanctions, favours the contractualisation (5) and the privatisation (6) of the penal intervention.
Keywords
- PENALITY
- CRIMINAL LAW
- CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
- ADMINISTRATION OF PENALTIES
Publisher keywords: ADMINISTRATION OF PENALTIES, CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PENALITY
This article is available in open access under our model Subscribe To Open.
Uploaded: 01/03/2008
https://doi.org/10.3917/ds.314.0487