Hybrid activities and employee health: What can industrial and organizational psychology do?
Pages 51 to 63
Cite this article
- BOBILLIER-CHAUMON, Marc-Éric,
- LUTUMBA, Priska,
- MORVAN, Noëmie,
- SCAVO, Giuseppe
- and STÉPHAN, Juliette,
- Bobillier-Chaumon, Marc-Éric.,
- et al.
- Bobillier-Chaumon, M.-É.,
- Lutumba, P.,
- Morvan, N.,
- Scavo, G.
- and Stéphan, J.
https://doi.org/10.3917/bupsy.588.0051
Cite this article
- Bobillier-Chaumon, M.-É.,
- Lutumba, P.,
- Morvan, N.,
- Scavo, G.
- and Stéphan, J.
- Bobillier-Chaumon, Marc-Éric.,
- et al.
- BOBILLIER-CHAUMON, Marc-Éric,
- LUTUMBA, Priska,
- MORVAN, Noëmie,
- SCAVO, Giuseppe
- and STÉPHAN, Juliette,
https://doi.org/10.3917/bupsy.588.0051
Recent developments in the world of work, marked by the emergence of new practices such as nomadic, mobile, co-modal, remote, and flexoffice working, have become widespread in all professional fields, leading to a hybridization of working methods. This hybrid model involves the alternation and/or coexistence of different modes of organization, space, and time, which individuals must relearn to manage, adjust, and combine. In these new professional contexts, practices become more personalized and less visible, more dispersed and fragmented, while also being more transparent and ephemeral. This poses new analytical challenges for the disciplines involved in understanding and reconstructing real work. The aim of this article is to describe these new forms of work and to explore methods of analysis and intervention that can make these activities more explicit and visible, in order to stimulate collective reflection on how to rethink these innovative configurations of work.