Références

• ACEROS J. C., POLS J., DOMÈNECH, M. (2014), « Where is Grandma? Home telecare, good aging and the domestication of later life », Technological Forecasting & Social Change, http://authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S0040162514000638.
• AHLIN T. (2017), « Only Near Is Dear? Doing Elderly Care with Everyday ICTs in Indian Transnational Families », Medical Anthropology Quarterly, doi:10.1111/maq.12404
• AKRICH M. (1992), « The de-scription of technical objects », in W. E. Bijker, J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology / building society. Studies in sociotechnical change, Cambridge, London, MIT Press, pp. 205-224.
• ARGYLE M. (1990), Bodily communication, London, Routledge.
• BALDASSAR L. (2007), « Transnational Families and Aged Care: The Mobility of Care and the Migrancy of Ageing », Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 33, n° 2, pp. 275-97.
• BALDASSAR L., BALDOCK C., WILDING R. (2007), Families Caring across Borders: Migration, Ageing and Transnational Caregiving, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
• BALDASSAR L., MERLA L. (2014), Transnational Families, Migration and the Circulation of Care: Understanding Mobility and Absence in Family Life, vol. 29, London, Routledge.
• BALDASSAR L., NEDELCU M., MERLA L., WILDING R. (2016), « ICT-Based Co-Presence in Transnational Families and Communities: Challenging the Premise of Face-to-Face Proximity in Sustaining Relationships », Global Networks, vol. 6(2), pp. 133-144.
• BAUER K. (2004), « Cyber medicine and the moral integrity of the physician-patient relationship », Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 6, pp. 83-91.
• BECK U., BECK-GERNSHEIM E. (2014), Distant Love, Cambridge, Polity Press.
• CUKOR P., BAER L. (1994), « Human factors issues in telemedicine: a practical guide with particular attention to psychiatry », Telemedicine Today, 29, pp. 16-18.
• CURRELL R., URQUHART C., WAINWRIGHT P., LEWIS R. (2000), « Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes », Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2000: CD002098.
• FISCHER C. S. (1992), America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940, Berkeley, University of California Press.
• FOUCAULT M. (1971), L’ordre du discours, Paris, Gallimard.
• GAMMON D., SÖRLIE T., BERGVIK S., SÖRENSEN HÖIFÖDT T. (1998), « Psychotherapy supervision conducted via videoconferencing: A qualitative study of users’ experiences », Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 52, pp. 411-421.
• HARAWAY D. (1991), « Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective », in Simians, cyborgs and women. The reinvention of nature, New York, Routledge.
• IHDE D. (1990), Technology and the lifeworld, Bloomington, MN, Indiana University Press.
• JOHNSON K. (2006), « TV screen, not couch, is required for this session », New York Times, 8 juin.
• KNUDSEN C. (2002), « Video mediated communication: Producing a sense of presence between individuals in shared virtual reality », in J. Baggaley, P. Fahy, C. O’Hagan (Eds.), Educational conferencing: Video and text traditions. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Educational Conferencing, Banff, Alberta, http://cde.athabascau.ca/ISEC2002/
• LAW J. (1999), « After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology », in J. Law, J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers.
• LAW J. (2004), After method: Mess in social science research. Durham, London, Duke University Press.
• LAW J., HASSARD J. (Eds.) (1999), Actor network theory and after, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers.
• LAW J., MOL A. (2008), « The Actor-Enacted: Cumbrian Sheep in 2001 », in C. Knappet, L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach, New York, Springer, pp. 57-78.
• LICOPPE C. (2017), « Showing objects in Skype video-mediated conversations From showing gestures to showing sequences », Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 110, pp. 63-82.
• LIE M., SÖRENSEN K. H. (1996), Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life, Oslo, Scandianavian University Press.
• LÓPEZ D. (2015), « Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life », Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 93, pp. 91-101.
• LÓPEZ D., CALLÉN B., TIRADo F., DOMÈNECH M. (2010), « How to become a guardian angel. Providing safety in a home telecare service », in A. Mol, I. Moser, J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice. On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 73-92), Bielefeld, Transcript Verlag.
• MADIANOU M., MILLER D. (2012), Migration and New Media. Transnational Families and Polymedia, London, Routledge.
• MOL A. (2002), The body multiple. Ontology in medical practice, Durham, London, Duke University Press.
• MOREIRA T. (2006), « Heterogeneity and coordination of blood pressure in neurosurgery », Social Studies of Science, vol. 36, pp. 69-97.
• MORT M., MAY C., WILLIAMS T. (2003), « Remote doctors and absent patients: Acting at a distance in telemedicine? », Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 28, pp. 274-95.
• MORT M., ROBERTS C., POLS J., DOMENECH M., MOSER I. (2013), on behalf of the EFORTT investigators, « Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited participative study », Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, vol. 18, n° 3, pp. 438-449.
• NEUSTAEDTER S. H., SELLEN A. (Eds.) (2013), Connecting Families: The Impact of New Communication Technologies on Domestic Life, London, Springer Verlag.
• NORMAN S. (2006), « The use of telemedicine in psychiatry », Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, vol. 13, pp. 771-777.
• ONOR M. L., MISAN S., (2005), « The clinical interview and the doctor-patient relationship in telemedicine », Telemedicine and E-Health, vol. 11, pp. 102-105.
• POLS J., MOSER I. (2009), « Cold technologies versus warm care? On affective and social relations with care technologies », ALTER—European Journal of Disability Research, vol. 3, pp. 159-178.
• SÄVENSTEDT S., ZINGMARK K., SANDMAN P. O. (2004), « Being present in a distant room: Aspects of teleconsultations with older people in a nursing home », Qualitative Health Research, vol. 14, pp. 1046-1057.
• SÄVENSTEDT S., ZINGMARK K., HYDÉN L. C., BRULIN C. (2005), « Establishing joint attention in remote talks with the elderly about health: A study of nurses’ conversation with elderly persons in teleconsultations », Scandinavian Journal of the Caring Sciences, vol. 19, pp. 317-324.
• THYGESEN H. (2009), Technology and good dementia care. A study of technology and ethics in everyday care practice, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK), Université d’Oslo, thèse de doctorat.
• THYGESEN H., MOSER I. (2010), « Technology and good dementia care: an argument for an ethics-in-practice approach », in M. Schillmeier, M. Domènech (Eds.), New Technologies and Emerging Spaces of Care (pp. 129-147), Farnham, Ashgate.
• THYGESEN H., POLS J. (2016), « Care, self-management and the webcam », in L. Manderson, E. Cartwright, A. Hardon (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Medical Anthropology, London, Routledge.
• VERBEEK P. (2006), « Materializing morality. Design ethics an technological mediation », Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 31, pp. 361-380.
• WAKEFIELD B. J., HOLAMAN J. E., RAY A., MORSE J., KIENZLE M. G. (2004), « Nurse and patient communication via low and high-bandwidth home telecare systems », Journal of telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 10, pp. 156-159.
• WHITTEN P., COLLINS B., MAIR F. (1998), « Nurse and patient reactions to a developmental home telecare system », Journal for Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 4, pp. 152-160.
• WILLEMS D. (1995), Tools of care? Explorations into the semiotics of medical technology, Université de Maastricht, thèse de doctorat.
• WITTGENSTEIN L. (1953), Recherches philosophiques [Philosophische Untersuchungen], Paris, Gallimard, trad. 2005.