Journal article
Zygmunt Bauman – An Ambivalent Utopian
Pages 347 to 364
Cite this article
- HVIID JACOBSEN, Michael,
- Hviid Jacobsen, Michael.
- Hviid Jacobsen, M.
https://doi.org/10.3917/e.rip.277.0347
References
- Appelbaum, R. (2002): Literature and Utopian Politics in Seventeenth-Century England. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Arribas-Ayllon, M. & A. Bartlett (2014): “Sociological Ambivalence and the Order of Scientific Knowledge”. Sociology, 48 (2): 335-351.
-
Bauman, Z. (1976a): Socialism – The Active Utopia. London: Allen & Unwin.
(1976b): Towards a Critical Sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
(1988): Freedom. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
(1989): Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
(1990): Thinking Sociologically. Oxford: Blackwell.
(1991): Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
(1992): Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge.
(1993): Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
(1999): In Search of Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
(2000): Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
(2002): Society Under Siege. Cambridge: Polity Press.
(2007): Liquid Times: Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
(2008): “Pro domo sua”, in M. H. Jacobsen & P. Poder (eds.): The Sociology of Zygmunt Bauman. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 231-240. - Bauman, Z. & K. Tester (2001): Conversations with Zygmunt Bauman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Bauman, Z., M. H. Jacobsen & K. Tester (2014): What Use Is Sociology? Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Beilharz, P. (1999): Zygmunt Bauman – Dialectic of Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
- Bleuler, E. (1911): Dementia Praecox oder Gruppe der Schizophrenien. Leipzig: Deuticke.
- Bloch, E. (2000): The Sprit of Utopia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Calvino, I. (1986): The Uses of Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Davis, M. (ed.) (2013): Liquid Sociology – Metaphor in Zygmunt Bauman’s Analysis of Modernity. Farnham: Ashgate.
- Featherstone, M. (2010): “Event Horizon: Utopia-Dystopia in Bauman’s Thought”, in Mark Davis M. & K. Tester (eds.): Bauman’s Challenge: Sociological Issues for the 21st Century. London: Palgrave/Macmillan, pp. 127-147.
- Fine, R. & W. Smith (2003): “Habermas’s Ambivalent Modernism”. Constellations, 10 (4): 469-488.
- Geoghegan, V. (1987): Marxism and Utopianism. London: Methuen.
- Gerhardt, U. (2000): “Ambivalent Interactionist – Anselm Strauss and the ‘Schools’ of Chicago Sociology”. American Sociologist, 31 (4): 34-64.
- Habermas, J. (1989): “The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Exhaustion of Utopian Energies”, in The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
-
Jacobsen, M.H. (2004): “From Solid Modern Utopia to Liquid Modern Anti-Utopia? – Tracing the Utopian Strand in the Sociology of Zygmunt Bauman”.
Utopian Studies, 15 (1): 63-87.
(2007): “Solid Modernity, Liquid Utopia – Liquid Modernity, Solid Utopia”, in Anthony Elliott (ed.): The Contemporary Bauman. London: Routledge, pp. 217-240.
(2016): “The Paradoxes and Ambivalences of Liquid Modernity”, in M. H. Jacobsen (ed.): Beyond Bauman –Critical Engagements and Creative Excursions. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing. - Jacobsen, M. H. & S. Marshman (2008): “Bauman’s Metaphors: The Poetic Imagination in Sociology”. Current Sociology, 56 (5): 798-818.
- Jacobsen, M. H. & K. Tester (2007): “Sociology, Nostalgia, Utopia and Mortality : A Conversation with Zygmunt Bauman”. European Journal of Social Theory, 10 (2): 305-325.
- Jacobsen, M. H., S. Marshman & K. Tester (2007): Bauman Beyond Postmodernity: Critical Appraisals, Conversations and Annotated Bibliography 1989-2005. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
- Kilminster, R.& I. Varcoe (1992): “Sociology, Postmodernity and Exile: An Interview with Zygmunt Bauman”, in Zygmunt Bauman: Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge, pp. 205-228.
- Kim, Kwang-Ki (2003): Order and Agency in Modernity – Talcott Parsons, Erving Goffman and Harold Garfinkel. New York: State University of New York Press.
- Kumar, K. (1987): Utopia and Anti-Utopia in Modern Times. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Mannheim, K. (1936/1976): Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Merton, R. K. (1976): Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays. New York: Free Press.
- Meštrović, S. (2005): Anthony Giddens – The Last Modernist. London: Routledge.
- Morawski, S. (1998): “Bauman’s Way of Seeing the World”. Theory, Culture & Society, 15 (1): 29-38.
- Morris, J.M. & A. L. Kroos (2004): The A to Z of Utopianism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Nijhoff, P. (1998): “The Right to Inconsistency”. Theory, Culture & Society, 15 (1): 87-112.
- Pietsch, J. & V. Moratta (2009): “Bauman, Strangerhood and Attitudes Towards Immigrants Among the Australian Population”. Journal of Sociology, 45 (2): 187-200.
- Suvin, D. (1990): “Locus, Horizon, and Orientation: The Concept of Possible Worlds as a Key to Utopian Studies”. Utopian Studies, 1 (2): 69-83.
- Tester, K. (2004): The Social Thought of Zygmunt Bauman. London: Palgrave/ Macmillan.
- Walaszek, Z. (1977): “Recent Developments in Polish Sociology”. Annual Review of Sociology, 3: 331-363.
- Weigert, A. J. (1991): Mixed Emotions: Certain Steps Toward Understanding Ambivalence. New York: State University of New York Press.
- Zielyk, I. V. (1966): “On Ambiguity and Ambivalence”. Pacific Sociological Review, 9 (1): 57-64.