References

• Andersson, F., Forslid, R., 2003. Tax competition and economic geography, Journal of Public Economic Theory 5(2), 279-303.
• Baldwin, R., 1998. Agglomeration and endogenous capital, Discussion Paper 1845, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
• Baldwin, R., 1999. Agglomeration and endogenous capital, European Economic Review 43, 253-80.
• Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Martin, P., Ottaviano, G.I.P., Robert-Nicoud, F., 2003. Economic Geography and Public Policy, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
• Baldwin, S., Krugman, P.R., 2004. Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonisation, European Economic Review 48(1), 1-23.
• Borck, R., Pflüger, M., 2006. Agglomeration and tax competition, European Economic Review 50(3), 647-68.
• Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., van Marrewijk, C., 2008. Agglomeration and government spending, in Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., (eds.), Foreign Direct Investment and the Multinational Enterprise, MIT Press (Cambridge, Massachusetts), 89-116.
• Brülhart, M., Trionfetti, F., 2004. Public expenditure, specialisation and agglomeration, European Economic Review 48, 851-71.
• Bucovetsky, S., 2005. Public input competition, Journal of Public Economics 89, 1763-787.
• Commendatore, P., Currie, M., Kubin, I., 2008. Footloose entrepreneurs, taxes and subsidies, Spatial Economic Analysis 3, 115-41.
• Commendatore, P., Kubin, I., 2006. Taxation and agglomeration, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics and Finance (CeNDEF) Working Paper 06-08, University of Amsterdam.
• Commendatore, P., Kubin, I., Petraglia, C., 2007. Productive public expenditure in a new economic geography model, Economic Growth: Institutional and Social Dynamics PRIN – 2005, Working Paper WP-016.
• Commendatore, P., Kubin, I., Petraglia, C., 2009. Footloose capital and productive public services, in Salvadori N., Commendatore, P., Tamberi, M. (eds.), Geography and Structural Change in Economic Development: Theory and Empirics, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, forthcoming.
• European Commission, 2007. Growing regions, growing Europe, Fourth report on economic and social cohesion, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
• Forslid, R., 1999. Agglomeration with human and physical capital: An analytically solvable case, Discussion Paper 2102, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
• Forslid, R., Ottaviano, G.I.P., 2003. An analytically solvable core-periphery model, Journal of Economic Geography 3, 229-40.
• Ihara, R., 2008. Transport costs, capital mobility and provision of local public goods, Regional Science and Urban Economics 38, 70-80.
• Krugman, P.R., 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy 99, 483-99.
• Krugman, P.R., Venables, A.J., 1995. Globalization and the inequality of nations, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(4), 857-80.
• Martin, P., 1999. Public policies, regional inequalities and growth, Journal of Public Economics 73, 85-105.
• Martin, P., Rogers, C.A., 1995. Industrial location and public infrastructure, Journal of International Economics 39, 335-51.
• Ottaviano, G.I.P., 2001. Monopolistic competition, trade, and endogenous spatial fluctuations, Regional Science and Urban Economics 31, 55-77.
• Romp, W., de Haan, J., 2007. Public capital and economic growth: A critical survey, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 8, 6-52.
• Samuelson, P., 1954. The transfer problem and transport costs, II: Analysis of effects of trade impediments, Economic Journal 64, 264-89.
• Trionfetti, F., 1997. Public expenditure and economic geography, Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 47, 101-20.
• Trionfetti, F., 2001. Public procurement, market integration, and income inequalities, Review of International Economy 9(1), 29-41.
• Venables, A.J., 1996. Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries, International Economic Review 37, 341-59.