References

• Backhouse R.E. 1994, “The Lakatosian Legacy in Economic Methodology”, in New Directions in Economic Methodology, R.E. Backhouse (ed.), London, Routledge, p. 173-191.
• Baer P., Athanasiou T. and Kartha S. 2007, “The Right to Development in a Climate Constrained World: The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework”, Publication Series on Ecology, Berlin, Heinrich Böll Siftung.
• Bennett D. 2008, “Paradigm Lost: Economists Missed the Brewing Crisis. Now Many Are Asking: How Can We Do Better”, Boston Sunday Globe, December 21.
• Bombardieri M. 2005, “Summers’ Remarks on Women Draw Fire”, Boston Globe, January 17.
• Bordo S. 1986, “The Cartesian Masculinization of Thought”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 11, n° 3, p. 439-456.
• Calmes J. 2008, “Rubinomics Recalculated”, New York Times, n° 158, November 24.
• Caplin A. 2008, “Economic Theory and Psychological Data: Bridging the Divide”, in The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook, A. Caplin and A. Schotter (eds.), Oxford, Oxford UP, p. 336-372.
  — and Schotter A. (eds.) 2008, The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook, Oxford, Oxford UP.
• Dasgupta P. 2005, “What Do Economists Analyze and Why: Values or Facts?”, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 21, p. 221-278.
  – 2007a, Economics: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford, Oxford UP.
  – 2007b, “Reply to Putnam and Walsh”, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 23, p. 365-372.
• Drèze J. and Sen A. 1989, Hunger and Public Action, Oxford, Clarendon.
• Fee E. 1983, “Women’s Nature and Scientific Objectivity”, in Women’s Nature: Rationalizations of Inequality, M. Lowe and R. Hubbard (eds.), New York, Pergamon Press, p. 9-27.
• Ferber M.A. and Nelson J.A. (eds.) 1993, Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
• – (eds.) 2003, Feminist Economics Today, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
• Folbre N. and Nelson J.A. 2006, “Why a Well-Paid Nurse Is a Better Nurse”, Nursing Economics, vol. 24, n° 3, p. 127-130.
• Frank R.H., Gilovich T. and Regan D.T. 1993, “Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 7, n° 2, p. 159-171.
• Greene J.D., Sommerville R.B., Nystrom L.E., Darley J.M. and Cohen J.D. 2001, “An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment”, Science, vol. 293 (Sept. 14), p. 2105?2108.
• Greene J. and Haidt J. 2002, “How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?”, Trends in Cognitive Science, vol. 6, n° 12, p. 517-523.
• Gul F. and Pesendorfer W. 2008, “The Case for Mindless Economics”, in The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook, A. Caplin and A. Schotter (eds.), Oxford, Oxford UP, p. 3?41.
• Haidt J. 2001, “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment”, Psychological Review, vol. 108, n° 4, p. 814-834.
• Harding S. 1986, The Science Question in Feminism, Ithaca, Cornell UP.
• – 1995, “Can Feminist Thought Make Economics More Objective?”, Feminist Economics, vol. 1, n° 1, p. 7-32.
• Henrich J., Boyd R., Bowles S., Camerer C., Fehr E. and Gintis H. (eds.) 2004, Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies, Oxford, Oxford UP.
• Jennings A.L. (ed.) 1993, Public or Private? Institutional Economics and Feminism, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
• Keller E.F. 1985, Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven (Conn.), Yale UP.
• Loewenstein G. and Haisley E. 2008, “The Economist as Therapist: Methodological Ramifications Of ‘Light’ Paternalism”, in The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook, A. Caplin and A. Schotter (eds.), Oxford, Oxford UP, p. 210-247.
• Longino H. 1990, Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton (NJ), Princeton UP.
• Marshall A. 1898, “Distribution and Exchange”, Economic Journal, vol. 8, n° 29, p. 37-59.
• McCloskey D.N. 1985, The Rhetoric of Economics, Madison (WI), University of Wisconsin Press.
• Mill J.S. 1836, “On the Definition of Political Economy; and on the Method of Philosophical Investigation in That Science”, London and Westminster Review, p. 1-29.
• Miller D.T. 1999, “The Norm of Self-Interest”, American Psychologist, vol. 54, n° 12, p. 1053-1060.
• Most S.B., Verbeck Sorber A. and Cunningham J.G. 2007, “Auditory Stroop Reveals Implicit Gender Associations in Adults and Children”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 43, p. 287-294.
• Nelson J.A. 1996, Feminism, Objectivity and Economics, London, Routledge.
• – 2006, Economics for Humans, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
• Nordhaus W.D. 2007, “A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 45, n° 3, p. 686?702.
  – 2008, A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies, New Haven, Yale UP.
• Paine L.S. 2002, Value Shift, New York, McGraw-Hill.
• Putnam H. and Walsh V. 2007a, “A Response to Dasgupta”, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 23, p. 359-364.
  – 2007b, “Facts, Theories, Values and Destitution in the Works of Sir Partha Dasgupta”, Review of Political Economy, vol. 19, n° 2, p. 181-202.
• Robbins L. 1935, An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London, Macmillan.
• Sachs J.D. 2005, The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time, New York, Penguin Group.
• Sen A. 1992, “Objectivity and Position”, The Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas.
• Stern N. 2006, “Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change”, London, HM Treasury.
• – 2008, “The Economics of Climate Change”, American Economic Review, vol. 98, n° 2, p. 1-37.
• Summers L. 2007, “Harness Market Forces to Share Prosperity”, The Financial Times, June 25.
  – 2008, “The Future of Market Capitalism”, Keynote Address at the Harvard Business School Global Summit.
• Tol R.S.J. 2008, “Why Worry About Climate Change? A Research Agenda”, Environmental Values, vol. 17, p. 437-470.
  – 2009, “The Economic Effects of Climate Change”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 23, n° 2, p. 29-51.
• Warren K.J. 2000, Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters, Lanham (Maryland), Rowman & Littlefield.
• Whitehead J.M. 1996, “Sex Stereotypes, Gender Identity, and Subject Choice at a-Level”, Educational Research, vol. 38, n° 2, p. 147-160.