Négociations 2017/1 No 27
Journal article

What place should compromise be given in democracy? A reflection on Hans Kelsen’s contribution

Pages 73 to 89

Cite this article

  • BAUME, Sandrine,
2017. What place should compromise be given in democracy? A reflection on Hans Kelsen’s contribution. Négociations, 2017/1 No 27, p.73-89. DOI : 10.3917/neg.027.0073. URL : https://shs.cairn.info/journal-negociations-2017-1-page-73?lang=en.
  • Baume, Sandrine.
« What place should compromise be given in democracy? A reflection on Hans Kelsen’s contribution ». Négociations, 2017/1 No 27, 2017. p.73-89. CAIRN.INFO, shs.cairn.info/journal-negociations-2017-1-page-73?lang=en.
  • Baume, S.
(2017). What Place Should Compromise Be Given in Democracy? A Reflection on Hans Kelsen’s Contribution. Négociations, No 27(1), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.3917/neg.027.0073.

https://doi.org/10.3917/neg.027.0073

Full-text article
Abstract
Bibliography
Authors
Figures

Bibliography

  • Aumann Robert (1976), « Agreeing to Disagree », Annals of Statistics, vol. 4, no 6, p. 1236-39.
  • Bellamy Richard (2012), « Democracy, Compromise and the Representation Paradox: Coalition Government and Political Integrity », Government and Opposition vol. 47, no 3, p. 441-465.
  • Burke Edmund (1987), « Speech on conciliation with America » (March 1775), in I. Hampsher-Monk (ed.), The Political Philosophy of Edmund Burke, Harlow, Longman.
  • Carens Joseph H. (1979), « Compromise in Politics », in J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds), Compromise in Ethics, Law and Politics, New York, New York University Press, p. 123-141.
  • Caldwell Peter C. (1997), Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law, Durkham and London, Duke University Press.
  • Fumurescu Alin (2013), Compromise. A Political and Philosophical History, Cambridge, CUP.
  • Gandhi Jennifer, Przeworski Adam (2006), « Cooperation, co-optation, and rebellion under dictatorships », Economics and Politics, vol. 18, no 1 p. 1-26.
  • Gaus Gerald F. (1990), Value and Justification: The Fondations of Liberal Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Heller Hermann (2000), « Political Democracy and Social Homogeneity », in A. Jacobson and B. Schlink (eds), Weimar: a Jurisprudence of Crisis, Berkeley; London, University of California, p. 256-265.
  • Jacobson Arthur J., Schlink Bernhard (2000), « Constitutional Crisis. The German and the American Experience », in A. Jacobson, B. Schlink (eds), Weimar. A jurisprudence of crisis, Berkeley; London, University of California.
  • Kelsen Hans (1925), Allgemeine Staatslehre, Berlin, Julius Springer.
  • Kelsen Hans (2000), « On the Essence and Value of Democracy », in A. Jacobson, B. Schlink (eds), Weimar. A jurisprudence of crisis, Berkeley, London, University of California, p. 84-108.
  • Kelsen Hans (2006), « Die Demokratie », dans M. Jestaedt, O. Lepsius (dir.), Verteidigung der Demokratie, Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2006, p. 115-148.
  • Kelsen Hans (2007), General Theory of Law and State, Clark, New Jersey, The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.
  • Kelsen Hans (2013), The Essence and Value of Democracy, Plymouth, Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Kuflik Arthur (1979), « Morality and Compromise », in J. Pennock, J. Chapman (eds), Compromise in Ethics, Law, and Politics, New York, New York University Press, 1979, p. 38-65.
  • Lijphart Arend (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven (CT), Yale University Press.
  • May Simon (2011), « Moral Compromise, Civic Friendship, and Political Reconciliation », Critical Review of Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 14, no 5, p. 581-602.
  • Mill John S. (1977), The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XIX – Essays on Politics and Society Part 2 (Considerations on Rep. Govt.), J. M. Robson (ed.), Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
  • Mill John S. (2015), On Liberty, Utilitarianism and Other Essays, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Morley John (1908), On Compromise, London, Macmillan.
  • Nachi Mohamed (2006), « Esquisse d’une théorie du compromis », in M. Nachi and M. de Nanteuil (eds), Éloge du compromis, Louvain-la-Neuve, Academia-Bruylant, p. 145-174.
  • Przeworski Adam (2010), Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Rintala Marvin (1969), « The Two Faces of Compromise », Political Research Quarterly, vol. 22, no 2, p. 326-332.
  • Rosenblum Nancy (2008), On the Side of the Angels. An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Scharpf Fritz W. (1993), « Versuch über Demokratie im verhandelnden Staat », in R. Czada and M. G. Schmidt (eds), Verhandlungs-demokratie, Interessenvermittlung, Regierbarkeit, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, p. 25-50.
  • Schoenberger Christoph (2000), « Introduction to Hugo Preuss », in A. Jacobson, B. Schlink (eds), Weimar. A jurisprudence of crisis, Berkeley, London, University of California, p. 110-115.
  • Schmitt Carl (1988), The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press.
  • Schmitt Carl (1996), Der Hüter der Verfassung, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot.
  • Schumpeter Joseph A. (2012), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Start Publishing LLC.
  • Smend Rudolf (1994), « Integrationslehre », in Rudolf Smend, Staatsrechtliche Abhandlungen und andere Aufsätze, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, p. 475-481.
  • Thompson Dennis F. (2007), « Mill in Parliament: When Should a Philosopher Compromise? », in N. Urbinati, A. Zakaras (eds), J.S. Mill’s Political Thought. A Bicentennial Reassessment, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 166-199.
  • Van Parijs Philippe (2012), « What Makes a Good Compromise? », Government and Opposition, vol. 47, no 3, p. 466-480.
  • Vinx Lars (2007), Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law: Legality and Legitimacy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary, Springfield, Mass, G.& C. Merriam, 1951.
  • White Johnathan, YPI Lea (2016), The Meaning of Partisanship, Oxford, Oxford University Press.