References

• Altshuller, G.S. (1996). … And suddenly the inventor appeared. Worcester, UK: Technical Innovation Center.
• Barras, C., Geoffrois, E., Wu, Z., & Liberman, M. (2001). Transcriber: Development and use of a tool for assisting speech corpora production. Speech Communication, 33(1-2), 5-22.
• Bonnardel, N. (2009). Activités de conception et créativité : de l’analyse des facteurs cognitifs à l’assistance aux activités de conception créatives. Le Travail Humain, 72(1), 5-22.
• Brangier, E., & Bastien, J.M.C. (2006). L’analyse de l’activité est-elle suffisante et/ou pertinente pour innover dans le domaine des nouvelles technologies? In G. Valléry & R. Amalberti (Eds.), L’analyse du travail en perspectives: influences et évolutions (pp. 143-156). Toulouse: Octarès.
• Cavallucci, D. (1999). Contribution à la conception de nouveaux systèmes mécaniques par intégration méthodologique. Doctoral dissertation, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg.
• Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404.
• Daniellou, F. (1992). Le statut de la pratique et des connaissances dans l’intervention ergonomique de conception (2ème ed.). Bordeaux: Editions du LESC de l’Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2.
• Daniellou, F. (2007). Simulating future activity is not only a way of improving workstation design. @ctivités, 4(2), 84-90.
• de Sá, M., & Carriço, L. (2008). Defining scenarios for mobile design and evaluation. Paper presented at the CHI2008 conference, April 5-10, Florence, Italy.
• Détienne, F., Martin, G., & Lavigne, E. (2005). Viewpoints in co-design : a field study in concurrent engineering. Design Studies, 26(3), 215-241.
• Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups : towards the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497-509.
• Dul, J., Bruder, R., Buckle, P., Carayon, P., Falzon, P., Marras, W.S., van der Doelen, B. (2012). A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics, 55(4), 377-395.
• Dul, J., & Neumann, W. P. (2009). Ergonomics contributions to company strategies. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 745-752.
• Durand, J., Weite, P. A., Gazo, C., & Lutz, P. (2007,). Determination and evaluation of the possible links and sequences between TRIZ and other design methods. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’07, August 28-31, Paris.
• Folcher, V. (2003). Appropriating artifacts as instruments : when design-for-use meets design-in-use. Interacting with Computers, 15(5), 647-663.
• Godet, M. (2007). Manuel de prospective stratégique (Vol. 2). Paris: Dunod.
• Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2002). From knowledge management to design-oriented organizations. International Social Science Journal, 54(171), 25-37.
• Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.
• Liem, A., & Brangier, E. (2012). Innovation and design approaches within prospective ergonomics. Work, 41, 5243-5250.
• Maguire, M. (2001). Methods to support human-centered design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 587-634.
• Nelson, J. (2011). Contribution à l’analyse prospective des usages dans les projets d’innovation. Doctoral dissertation, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Paris.
• Nelson, J., Buisine, S., & Aoussat, A. (2012). A methodological proposal to assist prospective ergonomics in projects of innovative design. Le Travail Humain, 75(3), 279-305.
• Nelson, J., Buisine, S., & Aoussat, A. (2013). Fostering creativity in the definition of future product use : a framework to assist user centered design and innovation. Applied Ergonomics, 44(6), 948-956.
• Osborn, A.F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York, NY: Scribner.
• Parnes, S.J., & Meadow, A. (1959). Effects of «brainstorming» instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50(4), 171-176.
• Paulus, P.B. (2000). Groups, teams and creativity: the creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology, 49(2), 237-262.
• Paulus, P.B., & Yang, H. C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: a basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 82(1), 76-87.
• Petit, J., Querelle, L., & Daniellou, F. (2007). Quelles données pour la recherche sur la pratique de l’ergonomie ? Le Travail Humain, 70(4), 391-411.
• Robert, J.-M., & Brangier, E. (2009). What is prospective ergonomics? A reflection and a position on the future of ergonomics. In B.-T. Karsh (Ed.), Ergonomics and Health Aspects (pp. 162–169). LNCS 5624, Springer Verlag.
• Robert, J.-M., & Brangier, E. (2012). Prospective ergonomics: origin, goal, and prospects. Work, 41, 5235-5242.
• Rosson, M.B., & Carroll, J.M. (2002). Usability engineering: scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Savransky, S.D. (2000). Engineering of creativity : introduction to TRIZ methodology of Inventive Problem Solving. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
• Torrance, E.P. (1995). Insights about creativity: questioned, rejected, ridiculed, ignored. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 313-322.
• van Belleghem, L. (2012). Simulation organisationnelle : innovation ergonomique pour innovation sociale. In M.F. Dessaigne, V. Pueyo & P. Béguin (Eds.), Actes du 47ème congrès de la Société d’Ergonomie de Langue Française. Lyon: Editions du GERRA.
• Veyrat, N. (2008). Les usages dans la lunette : co-concevoir des produits et des usages innovants. Doctoral dissertation, UPMF, Grenoble.
• Voros, J. (2009). Morphological prospection : profiling the shapes of things to come. Foresight, 11(6), 4-20.
• Ward, T.B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1-40.
• Woods, D.D., Tittle, J., Feil, A., & Roesler, A. (2004). Envisioning human-robot coordination in future operations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 34(2), 210-218.
• Zeng, L., Proctor, R.W., & Salvendy, G. (2010). Creativity in Ergonomic Design: A Supplemental Value-Adding Source for Product and Service Development. Human Factors, 52(4), 503-525.