The rise and fall of ready-made concepts
Reflections on the invention of the urban “underclass”
Pages 28 to 38
Cite this article
- WACQUANT, Loïc,
- Wacquant, Loïc.
- Wacquant, L.
https://doi.org/10.3917/lp.413.0028
Cite this article
- Wacquant, L.
- Wacquant, Loïc.
- WACQUANT, Loïc,
https://doi.org/10.3917/lp.413.0028
Building on the arguments presented in my book The Invention of the “Underclass”: A Study in the Politics of Knowledge (2022), this article puts forward three notions to ward off the trappings and dangers of the “pseudo” concepts that undermine sociological thought from within. The “lemming effect,” the “conceptual speculative bubble,” and the “turnkey problem” can help us collectively practice better analytical hygiene and identify the semantic, logical, and heuristic criteria that make a good scientific concept.
- analytical concept
- Bourdieu
- Koselleck
- underclass
- sociological epistemology
Publisher keywords: « underclass », analytical concept, Bourdieu, Koselleck, sociological epistemology