Couverture de SCPO_CHEA_2012_02

Chapitre d’ouvrage

Chapter 19. Redesigning dietary education

Pages 399 à 422

Notes

  • [1]
    The Giessen Declaration was announced at the 18th International Congress of Nutrition, held in Durban (2005).
  • [2]
    Newsletter Sustainable Earth Alliance, 7, October 2010 (http://www.terre-citoyenne.org/en/des-ressources/newsletter/october-2010.html).
  • [3]
    Mediterranean Institute of Certification (IMC) (http://lnx.imcert.it/v3/index.php?&lan=en).
  • [4]
    Consorzio per la Ricerca e Formazione sulla Sicurezza Alimentare (RIFOSAL) (http://www.rifosal.net/)
  • [5]
    Ministry of Culture and Tourism of Turkey, The Turkish and Ottoman Cuisine,Vol. 1 and 2 (DVD).
  • [6]
    Università degli Studi di Scienze Gastronomiche (http://www.unisg.it).
  • [7]
    The term describes unusual situations that are not addressed in DE programmes, such as DE on balanced diets for families who live in poverty, have no access to fresh food or to cooking facilities, or balanced diets when eating canned food (Cruise and Ware, 2010).
  • [8]
    Director, Office of Global Affairs of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Sharing the Responsibility: Noncommunicable Diseases”, The Washington Post, 14 September 2011 (http://washingtonpostlive.com/conferences/ncds#).

1The mention of health and nutrition in the Mediterranean region evokes the biodiversity of its genetic resources and a sustainable, healthy and balanced food system, the basic elements of which are shared by the countries of the Mediterranean Basin. The region has produced a dietary model that is renowned for enhancing health and prolonging life. It may be opportune, at this point, also to mention the tradition of dietary advice that has been practised in the region since ancient times. Following the ancient herbalists’ recognition of the value of natural sources for building good health, it was Avicenna (Ibn Sina), the Persian-born philosopher and scientist (980-1037), who devoted sections of his ”Canon of Medicine” not only to dietary advice in health and disease, but also to the importance of physical exercise for health and well-being. His recommendations for managing the lifestyle of elderly people included advice on food intake and on the need for regular light forms of physical activity. The ‘Canon’ was translated and used as a standard medical text in Western Europe for several centuries and is reported to have been still in use in Montpellier, France in 1650. During the same period, the use of “Diet” in the management of health disorders was mentioned in the Salernitan Guide to Health (Regimen Sanitatis Salernitanum) which was taught in the Salerno Medical school.

2The Giessen Declaration [1] (2005) is a significant landmark in the evolution of the science of nutrition, which directly influences the practice of dietary education (DE); it defines nutrition as “the study of food systems, foods and drinks, and their nutrients and other constituents and of their interactions within and between all relevant biological, social and environmental systems”. While contemplating the importance of the Mediterranean Diet in the evolution of DE, one finds it difficult to pin down its actual role and place. It varies between being the source of the principles that provide direction and guidance for the changes that are taking place and being itself the subject of those changes. The examples of DE programmes that successfully exploited Mediterranean-style dietary systems and practices can be credited to the resilience of a dynamic Mediterranean food system in all Mediterranean countries. The system has proved to be versatile enough to embrace the different contexts, conditions, imperatives and demands of modernity without losing the essence of its basic features and hence to guarantee the ability to maintain its continuity in a changing world. The challenge is therefore to be able to promote a sustainable Mediterranean-type pattern for food consumption as the model for the heralded “new food culture” (Reich and Gwozdz, 2011), the aim being for the healthy Mediterranean-style dietary systems to become a shared goal (Lacirignola and Capone, 2010) that is accessible to all, rather than the exception destined for the privileged. This would give Mediterranean countries a comparative advantage in the fight against the progressive global spread of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and obesity, which has not spared the Mediterranean region and is a cause for grave concern (OECD, 2010).

The increasing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs)

  • Two out of three deaths each year are attributable to NCDs. Four-fifths of these deaths are in low and middle-income countries, and one-third are in people under 60 years of age.
  • Taken as a whole, age-specific NCD death rates are nearly twice as high in low and middle-income countries than in high-income countries.
  • NCDs often cause slow and painful deaths after prolonged periods of disability.
  • In all regions of the world, the total number of NCD deaths is rising because of population ageing and the globalisation of risks, particularly tobacco use.
  • In addition to the long-standing challenges of curtailing infectious disease, this double burden of disease places enormous strains on resource-deficient health systems.
Source: Beaglehole (2011).

Dietary education in a changing world

3The purpose of dietary education is to help populations make the right food choices so as to consume a diet that enables them to lead a healthy, productive and socially active life. The changes that have taken place in the practice of DE are reviewed below against the factors that have influenced this evolution. As dietary education has evolved, implementation modalities have changed and innovative initiatives have been introduced adopting creative approaches to the formulation and communication of educational messages. The latter, in turn, build on the newly discovered relations and processes that are based on the outcome of the current understanding of biological knowledge systems (Brunori et al., 2008). The evolution in food production systems, scientific discoveries, changes in life-supporting ecosystems, and the introduction of novel food-processing techniques are some of the factors that influence the food production and consumption continuum, from the producer to the consumer (Figure 1). In facing the challenges of the multi-layered, complex causal web of interdependent factors for diet-related disorders, dietary education programmes necessarily had to integrate approaches involving a wide developmental base that brought in other partners and stakeholders from the various sectors concerned.

4The New Nutrition project introduced in the Declaration recognises the complexity of the discipline of nutrition and provides the elements that open up new domains and types of action for nutrition (or dietary) education (Cannon and Leitzmann, 2005).

Figure 1

Food chain continuum: fork to farm

Figure 1

Food chain continuum: fork to farm

Source: Christian Patermann, “The 7th Research Framework Programme in the area ‘Food, Agriculture, Fisheries and Biotechnology’”, European Commission, Directorate Biotechnologies, Agriculture and Food, DG Research, 2007.

5Practice has shown that limiting dietary education to communicating information on what makes up a balanced nutritious diet is not necessarily conducive to an improved state of health and nutrition, since the targeted groups may not be able to put the acquired knowledge into practice for reasons that are often outside their control (Yach, 2011). Thus, concomitant measures to promote healthy lifestyles (WHO, 2009a) and the creation of supportive enabling environments through statutory, regulatory, normative, fiscal or other types of action in the public domain which operate throughout the food production and consumption continuum (Figure 1) have become a necessary adjunct to DE (Padilla, 2010a).

6Strategies that are designed to overcome the challenges facing the realisation of the expected impact of food and nutrition information and education programmes continue to evolve and lend form and substance to what can become the “new” approaches to the food and nutrition education programmes of the 21st century. The challenges that represent a real threat to DE programmes in the 21st century include the danger of the irrevocable disruption of the food system and of local biodiversity, the rapid rhythm of modern life that is undermining family cohesion, and the gradual loss of esteem for and disappearance of traditional customs and practices, all of which interrupt the continuity in the “memory” of our Mediterranean food heritage (Padilla, 2010b). A number of innovative approaches, new actors and new domains for intervention are emerging in current DE programmes. They have all contributed to a dietary education “in the making”.

7DE is thus already evolving in response to the demands of a changing world, albeit with some differences in rate of progress between the industrialised countries of the North and the developing countries of the South. The difference can be attributed primarily to the difference in the epidemiological disease situation, which is still in transition in developing countries of the South (Chart 1). The overlap of undernutrition and NCDs (and obesity) in the same communities and even in the same family has called for efforts to rethink health policy with more focus on prevention and for measures to adapt the nutrition education messages to seemingly contradictory situations (Maire et al., 2002). Differences can also concern the gaps that exist in the legal, normative and regulatory frameworks and in the mechanisms for their enforcement and inequity in access to basic infrastructure services and social protection systems. The level of health and nutrition literacy (Vancheri, 2011) is a further contributing factor.

Chart 1

The risk transition

Chart 1

The risk transition

Note: Over time, the risks to health shift from traditional risks (inadequate nutrition, or unsafe water and sanitation) to modern risks (overweight and obesity). Modern risks can follow different trajectories in a country depending on the risk and the context.
Source: WHO (2009b).

Putting new knowledge and scientific advances into practice

8The application of the principles of biological systems (Brunori et al., 2008) in the study and analysis of cause and effect has allowed a better understanding of the role of each of the factors involved in the multi-layered interdependent causal pathways of diet-related problems. This in turn has helped to define their respective roles and inter -connections in a multi-disciplinary dietary education programme (Figure 2).

Figure 2

The causal chain

Figure 2

The causal chain

Note: This figure illustrates the major causes of ischemic heart disease. The arrows indicate some (but not all) of the pathways by which these causes interact.
Source: WHO (2009b).

9The old model of disease causation that identified specific causal agents allowed little scope for the view of free individual choice and behaviour as the main determinant of health or for population-level health determinants that affect in particular the spread of epidemics and the supply of food. A.J. McMichael (2009) believes that the recent public discussion of the rise of obesity in modern populations is an exemplary demonstration of this argument. Aberrant individual behaviour, fatness genes, and counselling by primary health-care personnel are all relevant, but only as adjuncts to the required government policy. Weight gain has, in modern times, become essentially a population-level problem, indicating a systemic imbalance within society of the typical pattern of daily metabolic energy flows and energy balance (Doucet and Tremblay, 1997). Re-creating living conditions that restore a balanced healthy metabolic energy profile as the standard profile calls for combined action by the health and other sectors in order to avert the foreseeable crisis of a worldwide obesity epidemic. Urban design, transport systems, food production and marketing are among the sectors concerned. Integrated policies and strategies implemented at all levels of society – individual, family, local, national and international – must necessarily recognise that individual choices are shaped by the wider context (Kumanyika, 2010). The simultaneous implementation of DE measures throughout the human life course can minimise the risk of compensatory actions and reinforce and sustain long-term behavioural change (Chart 2).

Chart 2

Cumulated nutrition-related risks throughout life

Chart 2

Cumulated nutrition-related risks throughout life

Working together with multidisciplinary partners

10The discipline of nutrition science is in the midst of a revolutionary change. The Giessen Declaration (2005) repositions nutritional science as follows: “the most relevant and urgent work to be done by professionals working in nutrition science and in food and nutrition policy, is in its three biological, social and environmental dimensions all together” and calls for the design of a broad, integrated approach to nutrition-related problems. The interdependent nature of relations between the diet and lifestyle-related risk factors (Figure 2) reflects the intersectoral nature of food and nutrition problems and involves an ever-widening circle of stakeholders in their causal web (Vandenbroeck et al., 2007; Finegood et al., 2010). The real challenge facing NCD control programmes is to be able to stimulate a multi-sectoral response and to devise nutrition and health promotion programmes for implementation not only by nutrition educators, but also by the various stakeholders.

11It is believed that DE also has a role to play in mobilising the contribution of other sectors to multidisciplinary programmes for achieving shared nutrition objectives on the basis of an understanding of how the potential input of each partner will contribute to the achievement of the shared nutrition goal(s). Relevant ministries and agencies include those for agriculture, food, finance and economy, trade, consumer affairs, development, transport, urban planning, education and research, social welfare, labour, sport, culture, and tourism. The active involvement of civil society is important for fostering public awareness and demand for action and for supporting the implementation of planned activities. Well-formulated food, nutrition and health messages can target various stakeholders and create a synergy between their respective actions, which will address complex and long-acting processes that cannot be managed by single-sector action.

The lead role of health professionals

12The health and nutrition specialist continues to play the leading role in the formulation of the messages conveyed in nutrition communication and education programmes (WHO, 2006). Health and nutrition messages serving the purpose of advocacy directed at the political or decision-making levels in the various sectors must necessarily be backed by economic analyses and arguments that clearly indicate – in health and development terms – the potential gains as well as the negative cost of inaction. It has been observed, however, that the health sector is still hesitating to embrace the other stakeholders concerned in a truly multidisciplinary approach to DE and health promotion. Yet the optimal delivery of the sector’s professional role actually depends on the contribution of other sectors towards improving the underlying determinants of population health, and A.J. McMichael (2009) wonders whether this hesitation on the part of the health sector – which carries primary responsibility for nutrition education – is due to the fact that this interdependence is not fully understood. The success of multidisciplinary approaches depends on action to remedy such deficiencies.

Integrating social health determinants

13The publication of the final report of the WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health (CSDH, 2008) drew attention to the impact of those determinants on the health, nutrition and well-being of populations. They have now been added to the list of enabling and supportive environments that enhance a successful outcome for health promotion and dietary education programmes. Extreme poverty, lack of access to clean drinking water and to other basic infrastructure services and hygienic living conditions undermine DE efforts, since their negative impact constitutes a barrier to the application of the knowledge gained from health and nutrition education/promotion measures. Changes in the social and economic environment have been identified as being the cause of risk factors for NCDs becoming widespread (Beaglehole et al., 2011). Diet and physical inactivity, as well as tobacco and harmful alcohol use are risk factors for NCDs, especially in children. Research evidence has shown that a certain level of health and nutrition literacy (Vancheri, 2011), of income, and of household food security is required for families to be able to apply the teachings of the commonly used food pyramid or dietary guidelines and, in particular, to meet the fresh fruit and vegetable requirements (Stewart et al., 2011; Padilla, 2010a). An appropriate social protection system can guarantee equity in access to food and act as conditions enabling poor households to apply the DE messages and advice. The prolonged association of poverty with NCDs poses a developmental risk and can act as a barrier to the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), in particular the health-related Goals, MDGs 1, 4, 5, and 6. (Beaglehole et al., 2011). Under such conditions, DE will need to be backed by poverty alleviation programmes and social protection systems in order to enable poor families to have access to balanced food intake.

Complementarity between dietary education and health promotion

14Research in the fields of health, nutrition and the social and behavioural sciences has accumulated a wealth of details on – inter alia – the way people live, the time spent on food-related activities such as meal patterns, food preferences, when, where and what people eat, how food is prepared, the type and frequency of physical activity, and the impact of different lifestyles on the type and quality of foods consumed. The overlap in the respective health and nutrition objectives of activities for promoting healthy diets and improving health status has led to a mutually beneficial joining of efforts between DE and health promotion activities. This is particularly evident in programmes designed for the prevention and control of NCDs (Sassi and Hurst, 2008). The lifestyle risk factors which are identified in the World Health Organisation’s Action Plan for the Global Strategy for Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases 2008-2013 (WHO, 2009a) and which are the focus of health promotion (and DE) activities in the various strategies for NCD prevention and control include the use of tobacco, harmful alcohol intake, physical inactivity and unhealthy diets.

Chart 3

Past and projected overweight rates in some countries

Chart 3

Past and projected overweight rates in some countries

Source: OECD (2010).
Chart 4

Past and projected overweight and obesity rates for children in France

Chart 4

Past and projected overweight and obesity rates for children in France

Source: “Analysis of data from the survey Santé et Protection Sociale 1992-2006, children aged 3-17” (OECD, 2010).

15Given the alarming increase in diet and lifestyle-related NCDs, in particular obesity, over the past few decades (Charts 3 and 4), counselling on physical exercise and management of the body’s energy balance (Kumanyika et al., 2010) has become an essential component of DE and health promotion programmes. Inculcating the physical exercise habit in children at an early age is regarded as an important component of campaigns for the prevention and control of obesity and other NCDs. The same goes for instilling healthy lifestyle habits in young children. The European-funded community-oriented intervention programme studying the “Identification and prevention of dietary and lifestyle-induced health effects in children and infants” (IDEFICS) aims to help develop new pathways for sustainable health-promoting communities. The data generated will produce guidelines for caregivers.

DE measures throughout the human life cycle

Pregnancy and early childhood

16The period of early childhood (9 months of pregnancy and the first two years of childhood) has been identified as the time when the future health of adults in respect of diet-related chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is determined (Victora et al., 2008). The critical importance of this early formative period in a child’s life is based on scientific evidence that traces the aetiology of several of the diet-related NCDs back to pregnancy and early childhood and to the illnesses, nutritional deficiencies and environmental insults suffered during this period of the human life cycle. A shift has thus resulted in the focus of nutrition education in order to include that critical early period of rapid growth (Chart 2). DE programmes that provide advice and guidance on balanced diets for pregnant women and on the importance of the exclusive breast feeding of newborns for at least 4 months are of paramount importance in NCD prevention and control programmes. In recognition of the above, the international mobilisation for the prevention of hunger and food insecurity has focused support on the first 1,000 days of life.

1,000 Days: Change a life, change the future

The programme with the above name was adopted by a group of world leaders and development agencies as a title for the communiqué announcing the outcome of their meeting on 21 September 2011. It emphasises the importance of working in partnership to address the crisis of malnutrition, which has been aggravated by the economic crisis, unstable energy prices and continued food price volatility. Chaired by Hilary Clinton, the meeting that brought together world leaders and development partners was held in New York on 21 September 2011. The 1,000 Days Partners gave themselves 1,000 days to produce results, from September 2011 to June 2013. The same figure also represents the 1,000-day period from pregnancy through to age two, which is critical in shaping a child’s life-long health and development. It represents a window of opportunity during which a set of proven nutritional measures can dramatically improve a child’s chances of surviving and living a healthy, productive and prosperous adult life. The 1,000-days Partnership serves as a platform for encouraging investment and strengthening policies to improve early nutrition in the developing world and to help achieve measurable benchmarks in improving maternal and child nutrition with long-lasting positive effects. This is done in alignment with the Scaling-Up Nutrition (SUN) Framework, which is a strategic approach that seeks to coordinate and accelerate international efforts to combat undernutrition (United Nations, 2010) under the leadership of the UN Secretary General and his Special Representative for Hunger and Food Security.

The school-age child

17It is in programmes targeting this age group that regulatory measures, innovative initiatives, and successful public-private partnerships have been introduced in DE. Innovation included the application of active and participatory education methods and of modern information/communication technology. The rapid and alarming rate of increase in overweight and obesity among school children is monitored by surveillance systems in northern Mediterranean countries (OECD, 2010). Chart 4 gives the projected figures for France. Obesity at an early age is not only a risk factor for chronic health conditions in later life, but is also associated with problems of poor self-esteem and psycho-social difficulties. Preventing obesity in schools builds on the recognition that achieving and maintaining a healthy weight is not just about a “diet” or “programme”. It is part of an on-going apprenticeship in lifestyles and practices that children can adopt at an early age and keep for the rest of their lives. Schools can help children adopt healthy eating habits and physical activity behaviour, which are the keys to preventing obesity. It is their responsibility to include intra-curricular classes for physical education and provide opportunities for sports activities. The participatory approaches and hands-on experiences that were used in some initiatives take DE one step further, turning theory and knowledge into practice.

18The Slow Food Foundation is particularly active in this area, especially in developing countries. Taste education and reviving the “memory of taste” for traditional Mediterranean foods is considered critical for preserving continuity in the eating habits of Mediterranean people. Schools and school-age children across European Union Member States have benefited from a number of regulatory and enabling measures adopted by the European Commission within a strategy for reducing child obesity (Box below). Improving the nutritional quality of school meals, promoting the consumption of fruit and vegetables through the free distribution of fruit in schools, and integrating physical education as an intra-curricular subject are some of the strategies adopted.

Feeding the elderly

19With the increase in life expectancy in Mediterranean countries the elderly form a community that is growing in numbers. On-going European-funded research projects are currently studying how diet can promote the health of the elderly and help prevent the development of age-related disease. One of the tasks that have been assigned is to produce a food pyramid for use in DE for the elderly, which meets the special dietary needs of those over 65 years of age (EUFIC, 2011). Knowledge on how a dietary system can impact on and prevent age-related diseases and functional decline will be valuable for DE as well as for a wide range of stakeholders, from the scientific community and health professionals to policymakers and industry. The integration of new knowledge

European school-based measures for controlling obesity

School-based measures can have a wide outreach to children of all social classes and, in turn, to their families. The aim of school DE programmes is – inter alia – to improve children and young people’s eating habits, to provide food and taste education for youngsters and make healthy options available, thus enabling them to make informed food choices. The programmes are co-financed with European funds and are matched by national and private funds. Two major initiatives were launched following the publication of the European Commission’s “Strategy for Europe on Nutrition, Overweight and Obesity-Related Health Issues” in 2007. The EU School Fruit Scheme (Council Regulation [EC] No. 1234/2007 [Articles 103ga and 103h] and Commission Regulation [EC] No. 288/2009 of 7 April 2009) and the EU School Milk Scheme (Council Regulation [EC] No. 123/2007; Commission Regulation [EC] No. 657/2008 of 10 July 2008) aim to provide easy access to fruit and quality milk products in conjunction with awareness activities and educational measures that teach children the importance of good eating habits. Initiated at the start of the 2009-2010 school year with 23 participating Member States, these schemes involved 25 States by the next school year 2010-2011. Eligible aid applicants among educational establishments include nurseries, other pre-school establishments, primary and secondary schools, education authorities, the suppliers or distributors of the products, as well as any public or private body managing the distribution of the products and the associated communication or evaluation activities. Local health authorities are required to endorse the list of products eligible for distribution in schools. The “Drink-it-Up” (http://www.drinkitup.europa.eu/) campaign aims to inform Europeans about the benefits of dairy products as a healthy alternative to junk food and drinks. The “Tasty Bunch” campaign under the slogan of “Eat it, Drink it, Move it” disseminates its messages through roadside shows in seven European countries with an information /education approach combining educational activities and games; it is supported by an interactive website, competitions and other events (http://europa.eu/agriculture/tastybunch/). The “European Schools for Healthy Food” campaign, which began in May 2010, is funded by the DG for Agriculture and Rural Development of the European Commission. It is a project coordinated by the Slow Food Foundation with 10 partner countries including France, Italy and Spain. The “Dream Canteen” initiative, a component of the project, promotes, in particular, the basic values of goodness and sustainability.
Source: “European Schools for Healthy Food” (2010), a European Commission-funded campaign (AGRI.2010-127).

20on nutrition and lifestyle into DE for the elderly will help to raise awareness and increase the understanding of the contribution of nutrition to healthy ageing and, in turn, will support the stakeholders in their efforts to improve the health and quality of life of the ageing population (EUFIC, 2011; INPES et al., 2010). DE programmes targeting this age group are expected to guide the consumer in making the right choices from the wide range of food products on the market that claim to be specially suited to the elderly as well as to promote healthy lifestyles and physical exercise.

Integrating environmental concerns

21A major concern expressed in various contexts over the past few decades is the balance between man’s health and the biosphere. The Giessen Declaration (2005) added an environmental as well as a social dimension to the science of nutrition and recognises that, “the human species has now moved from being principally concerned with personal and population health and with the exploitation, production and consumption of food and associated resources to a new period. Now all relevant sciences, including that of nutrition, should and will be principally concerned with the cultivation, conservation and sustenance of human, living and physical resources all together; and so with the health of the biosphere”. The physical, nutritional, microbiological, and mental impact of climate change came to the fore on the occasion of the 2009 Copenhagen Conference (McMichael et al., 2009). The realisation that the perpetuation of current eating patterns is placing a huge burden on the environment has exacerbated existing concerns about food security and the sustainability of the food supply system (Rastoin and Ghersi, 2010; European Commission, 2011). This calls upon DE programmes to integrate a dimension that is directed at promoting the consumption of sustainable diets, protecting natural resources and reducing waste. Diets that are protective and respectful of bio -diversity and ecosystems are culturally acceptable, accessible and affordable and nutritionally balanced and safe, and at the same time optimise natural and human resources (FAO, 2011a). The Mediterranean Diet is an example par excellence of a sustainable diet. Reasserting the value of the food heritage of Mediterranean countries can become the mainstay of efforts deployed to preserve environment-friendly Mediterranean eating practices (Padilla, 2010b). DE is thus expected to convey a number of messages that promote sustainable diets and the ethics of food consumption as applicable and relevant to each country and location and, more importantly, to raise awareness about current environmental issues such as carbon and water footprints. European initiatives to create networks among Mediterranean countries around environmental themes such the “Eating City” project, the “Ecopolis” project of the Sustainable Earth Alliance [2], the move by the Mediterranean Institute of Certification (IMC) [3] to create an ECO-friendly food quality label for mass catering services and restaurants, or the organisation of a series of Mediterranean Study Days to promote the value of the quality and safety of traditional food products of the Mediterranean countries (RIFOSAL Consortium) [4], are progressively expanding to involve a network of countries around the Mediterranean, both north and south.

Communicating with consumers

22Considering that an appreciable volume of food-related information that targets the public is produced by sources other than DE programmes, it is up to DE to help the consumer correctly interpret the significance of the information received, whether on a food label, on a menu, in the press, on the Internet, or from other sources. Keeping the consumer informed of new developments and scientific advancement in the field of food and nutrition is a responsibility of DE; with proper information, the consumer can make the correct health choices when faced, for example, with the newly emerging ultra-processed foods (Rastoin and Ghersi, 2010).

23With promotional information on commercial products dominating food information, DE education support in many instances has failed consumers, who have been left to cope on their own. The growth of the food industry – and the multiplication of novel food

The public health significance of ultra-processed products

A commentary published by Carlos Monteiro (2010) was not intended as an attack on the food industry as a whole or, more specifically, the food and drink production, manufacturing, distribution, catering and associated industries and their trade organisations. Carlos Monteiro agrees that the development and survival of the human species, and of civilisation in any sense of the word, has obviously always depended on the reliable and sustained production of food. He concurs that to demonise the food industry as a whole would be ignorant and irresponsible. However, Monteiro’s commentary is implicitly critical of the current policies and practices of food and drink manufacturers, caterers and associated industries, whose profits depend on the sale of what are termed ultra-processed products. He goes on to state that it would be absurd to suppose that ultra-processed products, which characteristically are ready-to-eat or ready-to-heat “fast” or “convenience” meals, dishes, foods, drinks, and snacks, are some sort of poison. The conventional evidence that some of these products – in particular sugared soft drinks – as now consumed in typically large quantities in hot countries, are seriously harmful to public health is extensively reported in the literature (Warner et al., 2006; Adams, 2005). This commentary does not say, nor does it imply, that the only healthy diets are those consisting solely or predominantly of unprocessed or minimally processed foods. The public health problem caused by ultra-processing becomes evident and turns into an acute crisis as the proportion of ultra-processed products within food systems, food supplies and family or individual diets rises, as it has done rapidly throughout the world, especially since the 1980s.
Source: Monteiro (2010).

24products – was too rapid for DE programmes to keep pace and provide guidance for consumers on how to be discriminative and make the healthy choice when faced with easily accessible and attractively priced processed products that are poor substitutes for traditional food products. The historical absence of appropriate nutrition education programmes to counterbalance the commercials and promotional material on processed foods of the 1970s and 1980s gave the food industry the monopoly of the food promotion scene. By the time the health professionals and nutritionists raised the alarm (WHO, 2003) about the negative impact of the unaccompanied transition from age-old food systems to modern “untested” eating patterns and food habits, the damage had already been done.

Public media and information technology

25Although the printed media often convey DE messages and treat DE topics, televised programmes remain the most popular form of media communication to the wider public particularly in the southern Mediterranean countries. Television programmes that disseminate information on traditional Mediterranean foods and sustainable diets and cookery demonstration programmes can reach a much wider audience than health-facility-based DE activities. They are popular and are often the primary communication channel for DE messages. However, television is a double-edged sword in the absence of regulations to control the aggressive advertising campaigns for sweets and junk foods that target children.

26Consumers living in communities with access to the Internet can benefit from the many forms of DE information and counselling services that are available through the World Wide Web, provided they are taught to seek them (Warner et al., 2006; Adams, 2005).

27Several national nutrition programmes have websites that provide all types of information and are often interactive, applying modern education and communication technologies that can even include pre-recorded video footage of live demonstrations. Several examples of DE advice for web-based social media users serve food, health and nutrition objectives. The DE messages are usually coupled with guidance on practical issues such as making out a health-conscious shopping list, composing a healthy menu, deciphering labels on food composition, what foods to avoid for their high salt and sugar content, the types of fat to avoid, and how to manage food allergies; there is even advice on classes of physical exercise and there are tips for physical fitness.

28A good example of a national DE and communication programme is the French National Health and Nutrition Programme 2001-2010 (PNNS). The PNNS is an example of government-sponsored public-private collaboration between research and education institutions, the food industry, healthcare organisations and consumers. The evaluation of the second phase – 2006-2010 – reports the relative success of the “communication” component (Menninger et al., 2010). This positive result could be attributed to the multiplication of communication channels and the diversification of the information campaigns that are decentralised and designed to meet the DE needs of the various segments of the target populations.

Culinary art and gastronomy for propagating DE messages

29The growing popularity among consumers of cooking recipes, cookery classes and demonstrations and the creativity of Mediterranean chefs has added an attractive dimension to DE that is also popular with the public media, whether printed, audiovisual or on digital forms of support as is the case in Turkey [5]. Dissemination of culinary tradition provides DE with the opportunity to document and propagate the country’s food heritage thus serving nutritional objectives as well as preserving memory, protecting biodiversity, and promoting the production and marketing of traditional food products. In the participatory culinary education initiative in Lebanon the chefs are housewives representing different gastronomic regions of the country. The “Tawlet El Tayyeb” weekly culinary demonstrations and tasting sessions (CIHEAM, 2011) use the produce of the regions to demonstrate how to prepare traditional regional Lebanese dishes. The promotion of gastronomic tourism, which also helps to make Mediterranean food systems known and to preserve continuity, is extending to the southern Mediterranean countries and is well underway in Morocco, Tunisia, Turkey and Lebanon. The Chef Association of Egypt is currently engaged in transposing ancient recipes of Egypt’s food heritage and adapting them to the preferences of the 21st century consumer (Hassan-Wassef, 2011), thus facilitating the trans-generational transmission of a valuable heritage. The contribution of the science of gastronomy to the dissemination of the values of the Mediterranean dietary system has been reinforced by the establishment of the Gastronomic University in Italy [6] (in the Piedmont and Emilia Romagna regions). Furthermore, the participation of Mediterranean countries in local and international food, gastronomy, and catering fairs offers a tasting experience and raises awareness as to the health and nutritional value of their food and helps to create market demand.

Dietary education in the 21st century

30Several factors have contributed to giving the discipline of DE as portrayed in the present review new form and content: the rising levels of health and nutrition literacy, the use of all forms of modern information communication technology, and the multiplication of the nutrition education subjects to be covered and of the results to be achieved through dietary education. The main noticeable difference between DE today and that practised in the mid 20th century is that, a few decades ago, food and nutrition education was mainly concerned with measures that focused predominantly on the chemical, biological and medical aspects of nutrition. Furthermore, the kind of food we eat and the way we eat used to be the responsibility of the family. With the interruption of the inter-generational transmission of food heritage or know-how, DE has moved in to protect the integrity of traditional food systems and prevent the loss of inherited knowledge, customs, practices and techniques. At the same time, DE aims to bridge the incompatibility gap that is perceived between the inherited food systems and modernity. DE thus continues to evolve, proposing a wider range of food-related learning experiences, which can sometimes be perceived as being outside the public health sphere and which – formerly – would have been the responsibility of the family. Apprenticeship and initiation into the actual practice of healthy eating habits in a modern world is an example of a new application for DE. A methodology has even been devised for measuring the competence of eaters (Satter, 2007). The Box below presents a set of guiding principles for increasing the impact of DE programmes.

Guiding principles for Dietary Education in the 21st Century

The following is a set of guiding principles aiming to increase the impact of DE derived from the issues raised in this article. They need to be adapted to local contexts:
  • Give due attention to the legal, normative and regulatory frameworks and supportive measures in the public domain that create an enabling environment for turning DE knowledge into practice.
  • Learn lessons from the success stories in some Mediterranean communities which have preserved their food habits.
  • Support efforts mobilised to transpose the Mediterranean food heritage into food consumption patterns compatible with modern lifestyles.
  • Use culinary art to adapt food heritage recipes to the demands of the modern consumer.
  • Create mechanisms to involve the target populations in the design of DE programmes whenever applicable.
  • Use the results of the monitoring and evaluation of DE measures to guide reprogramming and improve impact.
  • Identify and overcome barriers – however trivial – that stand in the way of the practical application of the teachings of DE.
  • Establish rules for engagement with the private sector and the food industry as an ally and partner (UNSCN, 2007).
  • Strengthen and support the DE role of the family and the school.
  • Raise health and nutrition literacy levels; this remains the most important protective measure against NCDs.

31To understand what DE stands for today, a listing was made of all the types of information used in DE and the related support activities which communicate a dietary education message. The information was found to vary according to the subject treated and the impact to be achieved. DE information could be designed to serve a variety of purposes such as awareness raising, persuasion and attitude change, teaching, learning, demonstration, promotion, advocacy. DE programmes can also be used to contribute to habit forming or habit breaking, guided by the results of on-going research (Issanchou, 2011) that aims to better understand how food habits and eating patterns are formed and the key determinants of behaviour change. A review of the different DE messages currently in use has shown wide variation in the topics they addressed, of which about 22 were identified. They varied between simple messages on the food we eat and why we eat it to market-related consumer education, sugar, salt and fat control, preparing and serving food – from theory to practice –, providing contextual [7] food and nutrition guidance, or promoting ethical considerations such as reducing food waste. The outcome of the above exercise shows that, in the 21st century, DE addresses areas that are not strictly within the public health and disease spheres but extend to the social and environmental and can even deal with family and cultural values and ethical considerations (Reisch and Gwozdz, 2011).

Policy and programme implications

32The overview given in preceding sections shows that the evolution of the science of nutrition is a process in full progress (Cannon and Leitzmann, 2005), which continues to interact with the various factors that have contributed towards influencing the form and substance of DE over the past decades. They show how a form of DE is emerging that is adapting to the demands of new roles and new types of action. That is to say, the process of transformation into a “new” form of dietary education is already underway.

A dietary education evolution in progress

33However, DE programmes are not homogeneous; the level and quality of performance varies in both northern and southern Mediterranean countries. The structured and holistic approach to NCD (and obesity) prevention and control is encountered more in the northern countries, where a wide range of partners, and in particular the food industry, are mobilised and involved (Ritsatakis and Makara, 2009). DE in southern Mediterranean countries tends to be more oriented towards controlling individual NCDs and there is less focus on the general preventive and lifestyle aspects of the control programmes (WHO, 2011). Also, NCDs and obesity are not as high on the political agenda as they are in the north despite the fact that some of the highest obesity rates in the region are found in the south, and despite the serious economic implications for developing countries (Global Health Council, 2011; United Nations, 2011).

34The policy and programme implications for DE are examined from the perspective of the current NCDs (and obesity) crisis. Attention is given to policy and programmes that support and enhance the contribution of DE towards promoting the Mediterranean dietary system as the model for a “new food culture” for the 21st Century. The present point in time is exceptionally opportune for launching action based on the Mediterranean dietary model – a model that can offer practical, affordable, and accessible solutions that are derived from local dietary systems and are culturally acceptable. This would hopefully restore some order to the observed breakdown of meal rhythm and eating habits and the disruption of inherited food systems (Reich and Gwozdz, 2011). As mentioned earlier, the Mediterranean food system has proved to be versatile enough to embrace the various contexts, conditions, imperatives and demands of modernity without losing the essence of its basic features and thus guarantees the ability to adapt to different contexts. The above analysis favours the conclusion reached by Jean-Louis Rastoin and Gérard Ghersi (2010) that tradition and modernity are not enemies and that mutual correction, rather than mere cohabitation, is the solution.

35Several authors have observed that awareness programmes have limited impact and that changing habits is not an easy task (Yach, 2011). If DE programmes are to achieve their expected impact they need to be accompanied by a change in living environments. The effect of any new DE on NCDs will be seriously undermined in the absence of appropriate legal, regulatory and policy measures that serve to reduce obesogenic and other risks (Townshend and Lake, 2009) and to enhance the success of DE programmes.

Basic components of a DE policy

36The following paragraph is derived from various recent capacity and programme evaluation reports (Meninger, 2010; Ritsatakis and Makara, 2009; Alwan et al., 2010; WHO, 2010; IOTF, 2010; OECD, 2010), as well as from the analysis made in preceding sections. It presents the conditions that have been found to contribute to the achievement of DE programme objectives.

37Importance is attached to a forward-looking policy framework which involves all of the relevant sectors with a view to removing any incoherence in legal and policy frameworks that influence healthy environments and which addresses any contradictions that may exist between sectoral policies and DE messages. DE programmes must reflect integrated multi-sectoral policies, strategies and approaches and must be given adequate financial means. The creation of a forum or platform is called for (European Commission, 2007) to allow exchanges between all partners (including consumers) and to act as an overall resource mobilisation and coordination tool facilitating integrated collaborative action. It is crucial that a balance be maintained between the curative and preventive components of NCD programmes and that population-based pathways to healthy living be sustainable. Measures to promote a healthy lifestyle and the practice of regular physical activities are to be regarded as integral components of DE programmes, together with activities aiming to reduce identified risk factors. Elements in DE policy which support the promotion of Mediterranean food systems include the introduction of appropriate measures to preserve biodiversity and the continuity of local eating habits. The latter are reinforced by involving chefs in initiatives to adapt culinary traditions to suit 21st century consumer preferences. The DE tools used for promoting sustainable consumption patterns must draw on local food resources and the Mediterranean dietary model. The policy is expected to support activities aiming to cultivate the agro-food industry as a strategic partner.

Evolution of probable scenarios

Maintaining the status quo with no change

38In a no-change scenario, the situation regarding poor financing of preventive programmes in NCD (and obesity) programmes continues. Nutrition continues to rank low on the political agenda and remains low (WHO, 2010). The curative health service dimension of the programmes continues to take precedence over the preventive and health-promotion aspects. Several of the dietary educators, especially in the new generations, are not familiar with their own food heritage and food habits, and advice for improving diets does not necessarily draw on local food sources. Only a few dietary educators are aware of the Mediterranean Diet and its value and understand the notion of sustainability and what it means for their work. They may not all be familiar with the contribution of other sectors to the success of DE programmes. Dietary guidelines, tools and communication materials do not reflect local conditions and resources and may not integrate or follow the principles of the Mediterranean model.

39There is no institutionalised forum that brings northern and southern Mediterranean countries together around the subject of a shared Mediterranean dietary system. The limited number of initiatives involving schools or rural communities in southern Mediterranean countries often remain isolated experiences with limited dissemination or impact of their results. There is no platform for fostering regular dialogue with the agro-food industry and other stakeholders, and there are no regulations governing the ultra-processing of food. The leadership role of the health sector is weak and nutrition programmes and their DE components do not adopt an integrated forward-looking vision of the food and nutrition situation and its health implications. Nutrition standards for marketing foods to children – where they exist – are not always heeded. Appropriate supportive measures, whether statutory, regulatory or policy-based, which serve to reduce the identified risks and obesogenic environment are weak or absent, and this considerably undermines the sustainability of the impact of DE programmes. The training of dietary educators is not updated and adapted to the demands of the current situation and remains deficient in components that relate to the shared Mediterranean food heritage and dietary model.

Best-case scenario

40The best-case scenario can be described as a situation where the following is taking place or has been achieved, depending on the context where the measures are being applied. The scenario can include any combination of the factors set out below. In widening the scope of the new nutrition project, George Kent (2006) draws attention to the limited ability of the nutrition profession to adequately cover the added social and environmental dimensions. Adequate coverage of those dimensions is one of the factors assumed to be achieved in a best-case scenario, and will necessarily have to be accompanied by “new” dietary or nutrition education that can meet new demands.

41The existing initiatives and programmes for networking and dialogue between Mediterranean countries around the subject of the sustainable Mediterranean Diet have become inclusive, admitting the membership of all Mediterranean countries. Continuity in the traditional food system is maintained and dietary educators (especially the new generations) are familiar with their food heritage and the nutritional value of local foods and dishes. DE programmes preserve the trans-generational transmission of culinary tradition and the memory of taste for local foods and food products. DE guidelines and DE education programmes draw on and promote the consumption of local products and are based on the Mediterranean dietary model, and DE tools have been revised accordingly. Nutritionists and culinary experts have adapted traditional foods to render them acceptable to the modern consumer. Community-based solutions for promoting DE and a healthy lifestyle are sustainable (IDEFICS, 2011). DE programmes build on the positive experience of communities which have maintained their Mediterranean-style food systems, food habits and way of life over the ages.

42Demand is created for Mediterranean-style eating and living which becomes an accessible and affordable preference for consumers. DE programmes succeed in making Mediterranean-style living and eating a way of life and everyday practice. Appropriate supportive legal and regulatory frameworks and policies have been adopted (Parker et al., 2011) and barriers to healthy living and healthy food choices have been identified and reduced. Fast-food outlets offer foods and menus derived from the local food heritage. A new generation of snacks, convenience foods, and food for the elderly has been derived from local and traditional Mediterranean-style foods and respects the Mediterranean principles of low salt, sugar and fat content. Progress continues to be made by the European and southern Mediterranean food industry in achieving the targeted changes in processed foods (CIAA, 2011). Strategic alliances negotiated with the food industry succeed in curbing the production of unhealthy food. Dietary educators involve agricultural extension workers in achieving the shared goals of the protection of biodiversity, the promotion of local food products and the improvement of household food security (Christoplos, 2010). Feedback from on-going regional debates on sustain - able diets and the health and other attributes of the Mediterranean Diet reach the dietary educator and are integrated into DE programmes. The global survey initiated by FAO (2011b) on the identity and the training requirements of dietary educators has been completed and the opportunity to integrate elements to promote diet sustainability and other characteristics of the Mediterranean model in the new DE training modules is taken and acted upon.

Conclusion

43The global mobilisation of world leaders at the High-Level Meeting of the UN General Assembly of 19 and 20 September 2011 (United Nations, 2011) to reverse the NCD and obesity epidemic provides unprecedented opportunities for health and dietary education to make headway in new areas and gradually assume new roles and responsibilities. Olivier De Schutter, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, described this as the once-in-a-generation opportunity to crack down on bad diets that must not be missed (De Schutter, 2011). It was only days later that Denmark announced in the public media the introduction of the world’s first-ever tax on fats, imposing a surcharge on all food products containing more than 2% of saturated fats.

44Efforts deployed to date to control and prevent NCDs show that the various programmes and initiatives continue to tend to focus more on curative rather than on preventive measures. On-going initiatives to regain the curative-preventive balance offer a potential window of opportunity to strengthen the preventive component of NCD control programmes using the Mediterranean Diet as a model for developing country-specific DE programmes and schemes and materials for promoting a healthy lifestyle. Dietary and healthy lifestyle education will necessarily assume a wider and more strategic role in NCD prevention and control programmes than will be the case with other health disorders. As was aptly observed by the Hon. Nils Daulaire [8], the fight against NCDs is no more against bacteria, or viruses or parasites, “we are starting to get to a point where we have to battle human nature” – hence the need for a re-invented and innovative dietary education and for effective programmes to promote a healthy lifestyle.

Bibliographie

Bibliography

  • Adams (Mike), The Health Ranger, “The Health Effects of Drinking Soda – Quotes from the Experts”, NaturalNews.com, 8 January 2005
  • (http://www.naturalnews.com/004416.html#ixzz1Us1ABnH7).
  • Alwan (Ala Alwan), MacLean (David R.), Riley (Leanne M.), Tursan d’Espaignet (Édouard), Mathers (Colin Douglas), Stevens (Gretchen Anna) and Bettcher (Douglas), “Monitoring and Surveillance of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases: Progress and Capacity in High Burden Countries”, The Lancet, “Chronic Diseases: Chronic Diseases and Development Series 5”, 376 (9755), November 2010, pp. 1861-1868.
  • Beaglehole (Robert), Bonita (Ruth), Horton (Richard), Adams (Cary), Alleyne (George), Asaria (Pervit) et al. (The Lancet NCD Action Group and The NCD Alliance), “Priority Actions for the Non-communicable Disease Crisis”, The Lancet, 377 (9775), April 2011, pp. 1438-1447.
  • Brunori (Gianluca), Jiggins (Janice), Gallardo (Rosa) and Schmidt (Otto), New Challenges for Agricultural Research: Climate Change, Food Security, Rural Development, Agricultural Knowledge Systems, Brusels, European Commission, Standing Committee on Agricultural Research (SCAR), 2008.
  • Cannon (Geoffrey) and Leitzmann (Claus), “The New Nutrition Project”, Public Health Nutrition, 8 (6a), 2005, pp. 673-694.
  • Christoplos (Ian), Mobilizing the Potential of Rural and Agricultural Extension, Rome, FAO, Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, 2010.
  • CIHEAM, “Urban Agriculture in the Mediterranean”, CIHEAM Watch Letter, 18, September 2011.
  • Commission on Social Determinants of Health (CSDH), Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the CSDH, Geneva, WHO, 2008.
  • Confederation of the Food and Drink Industries of Europe (CIAA), “Reformulation and Innovation” (http://www.active-lifestyle.eu/php/today/reformulation/index.php?doc_id=407).
  • Cruise (Seymourina) and Ware (Steven), Les Recettes inavouables, Paris, Hachette Pratique, 2006.
  • Cruise (Seymourina) and Ware (Steven), Les Recettes inavouables… la suite, Paris, Hachette Pratique, 2010.
  • De Schutter (Olivier), “The Chance to Crack Down on Bad Diets Must not Be Missed”, Press Release, Geneva, 16 September 2011 (http://www.srfood.org/index.php/en/media/pressreleases).
  • Doucet (E.) and Tremblay (A.), “Food Intake, Energy Balance and Body Weight Control”, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 51 (12), December 1997, pp. 846-855.
  • European Food Information Council (EUFIC), “Time to find the recipe for healthy ageing in Europe”, EU-Project Supplement, June 2011 (http://www.eufic.org/article/fr/nutrition/comprendre-alimentation/artid/temps-trouver-recette-bien-vieillir-Europe/).
  • European Commission, “White Paper on A Strategy for Europe on Nutrition, Overweight and Obesity Related Health Issues”, COM (2007) 279 final, Brussels, European Commission, 2007.
  • European Commission, “Commission Recommendation on the Research Joint Programming Initiative: ‘A Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life’”, 2010/250/EU, Brussels, European Commission, 28 April 2010.
  • European Commission, “Sustainable Food Consumption and Production in a Resource-Constrained World”, Brussels, The Standing Committee on Agricultural Research (SCAR), Third Foresight Exercise (FEG3), February 2011
  • (http://ec.europa.eu/research/agriculture/scar/pdf/scar_feg3_final_report_01_02_2011.pdf).
  • FAO, Biodiversity and Sustainable Diets. Report, Rome, FAO, International Scientific Symposium, 3-5 November 2010, 2011a.
  • FAO, “Interview Form – Country Case Studies on the Need for Professional Training/Education in Nutrition Education and Communication (NEAC)”, Document produced by The Nutrition Education and Consumer Awareness Group of the Nutrition and Consumer Protection Division (AGN), Rome, FAO, 2011b.
  • Finegood (Diane T.), Merth (Thomas D.N.) and Rutter (Harry), “Implications of the Foresight Obesity System Map for Solutions to Childhood Obesity”, Obesity, 18, 2010, pp. S13-S16.
  • “Giessen Declaration (The)”, Public Health Nutrition, 8 (6a), 2005, pp. 783-786.
  • Global Health Council, Global Leadership, Local Solutions: Mobilising for NCDs. A Statement of the Global Health Council NCD Roundtable, Washington (D.C.), Global Health Council, June 2011 (http://www.globalhealth.org/images/pdf/ncds.pdf).
  • Hassan-Wassef (Habiba), “Valorization of the Egyptian Food System and Quality Food Production in the Egyptian Restaurants and Tourism Industry. An Ongoing Project in Collaboration with IMC Italy”, personal communication, May 2011.
  • IDEFICS Consortium, “The IDEFICS Community-oriented Intervention Programme: A New Model for Childhood Obesity Prevention in Europe?”, International Journal of Obesity (London), 35 (supplement 1), 2011, pp. S16-S23.
  • INPES, Institut de veille sanitaire, Ministère de la Santé et des Solidarités, AFSSA and Assurance Maladie, La Santé en mangeant et en bougeant. Le guide Nutrition à partir de 55 ans, Paris, Programme national de Nutrition Santé (PNNS), 2011 (http://www.inpes.sante.fr/CFESBases/catalogue/pdf/932.pdf).
  • International Obesity Task Force (IOTF), “Strategic Plan for IOTF”, Draft, 2, August 2010
  • (http://www.iaso.org/site_media/uploads/IOTF_Strategic_Plan_-_August_2010_11_08_10_pdf.pdf).
  • Issanchou (Sylvie), “Food Habit Formation and Breaking in Early Childhood”, paper presented at the European project “HabEat”, Brussels, Workshop “New Technologies and Innovations to Tackle Obesity”, 16 November 2010.
  • Jourdain Menninger (Danièle), Lecoq (Gilles), Guedj (Jérôme), Boutet (Pierre), Danel (Jean-Baptiste) and Mathieu (Gérard), Évaluation du programme national nutrition santé (PNNS, 2006-2010), Paris, Inspection générale des Affaires sociales and Conseil général de l’alimentation, de l’agriculture et des espaces ruraux, April 2010.
  • Kent (George), “How Far Should Nutrition Reach?”, Public Health Nutrition, 9 (5), 2006, pp. 662-663, 2006.
  • Kumanyika (Shiriki K.), Parker (Lynn) and Sim (Leslie J.), Bridging the Evidence Gap in Obesity Prevention: A Framework to Inform Decision Making, Washington (D.C.), National Academy of Sciences, National Academies Press, 2010.
  • Lacirignola (Cosimo) and Capone (Roberto), “Rethinking the Mediterranean Diet for the 21st Century”, CIHEAM Watch Letter, 13, Spring 2010.
  • Maire (Bernard), Lioret (Sandrine), Gartner (Agnès) and Delpeuch (Francis), “Transition nutritionnelle et maladies chroniques non transmissibles liées à l’alimentation dans les pays en développement”, Cahiers d’études et de recherches francophones/Santé, 12 (1), January-February 2002, pp. 45-55.
  • McMichael (A.J.), Neira (M.), Bertollini (R.), Campbell-Lendrum (D.) and Hales (S.), “Climate Change: A Time of Need and Opportunity for the Health Sector”, The Lancet, 374 (9707), 25 November 2009, pp. 2123-2125.
  • Monteiro (Carlos) “The Big Issue Is Ultra-processing”, World Nutrition. Journal of the World Public Health Nutrition Association, 1 (6), November 2010, pp. 237-269.
  • OECD, Healthy Choices. Report of the OECD Health Ministerial Meeting, Paris, OECD, 7-8 October 2010.
  • Padilla (Martine), “New policies in the Mediterranean Region”, CIHEAM Watch Letter, 13, Spring 2010a, pp. 12-14.
  • Padilla (Martine), “Is the Mediterranean Diet, World Paragon, Sustainable from Field to Plate?”, Paper presented, Rome, Biodiversity and Sustainable Diets, International Scientific Symposium, 3-5 November 2010b.
  • Parker (Lynn), Spear (Matthew), Holovach (Nicole Ferring) and Olsen (Stephen) (rapporteurs) Legal Strategies in Childhood Obesity Prevention: Workshop Summary, Washington (D.C.), Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, National Academies Press, 2011.
  • Rastoin (Jean-Louis) and Ghersi (Gérard), Le Système alimentaire mondial. Concepts et méthodes, analyses et dynamiques, Versailles, Quæ, 2010.
  • Reich (Lucia A.) and Gwozdz (Wencke), “Chubby Cheeks and Climate Change: Childhood Obesity as a Sustainable Development Issue”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35 (1), 2011, pp. 3-9.
  • Ritsatakis (Anna) and Makara (Péter), Gaining Health. Analysis of Policy Development in European Countries for Tackling Noncommunicable Diseases, Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2009.
  • Sassi (Franco) and Hurst (Jeremy), “The Prevention of Lifestyle-Related Chronic Diseases: An Economic Framework”, OECD Health Working Papers, 32, DELSA/HEA/WD/HWP (2008)2, 2008 (http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/14/40324263.pdf).
  • Satter (Ellyn), “Eating Competence: Definition and Evidence for the Satter Eating Competence Model”, Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 39 (5, supplement), September 2007, pp. 142-143.
  • Stewart (Hayden), Hyman (Jeffrey), Frazao (Elizabeth), Buzby (Jean-C.) and Carlson (Andrea), “Can Low Income Americans Afford to Satisfy My Pyramid Fruit and Vegetable Guidelines?”, Journal of Nutrition Education and Behaviour, 43 (3), May 2011, pp. 173-179.
  • Townshend (Tim) and Lake (Amelia A.), “Obesogenic Urban Form: Theory, Policy and Practice”, Health and Place, 15, 2009, pp. 909-916.
  • United Nations, Updated Comprehensive Framework for Action. Scaling-up Nutrition, New York (N.Y.), UN High Level Task Force on the Global Food Security Crisis, September 2010.
  • United Nations, “Political Declaration of the High Level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases”, 66th Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations, Document A/66/L.1, New York (N.Y.), United Nations, 19-20 September 2011.
  • United Nations System, Standing Committee on Nutrition (UNSCN), “A Draft Proposal for Initiating SCN Private Sector Engagement”, Geneva, UNSCN, 2007 (http://www.unsystem.org/scn/Publications/html/private_sector.htm).
  • Vancheri (Cori) (rapporteur), Innovations in Health Literacy. Workshop Summary, Washington (D.C.), Population Health and Public Health Practice Board of the Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, 2011.
  • Vandenbroeck (Philippe), Goossens (Jo) and Clemens (Marshall), Foresight. Tackling Obesities: Future Choices – Building the Obesity System Map, London, Government Office for Science, UK Government’s Foresight Programme, Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills, 2007 (http://www.foresight.gov.uk/Obesity/12.pdf).
  • Victora (Cesar G.), Adair (Linda), Fall (Caroline), Hallal (Pedro C.), Martorell (Reynaldo), Richter (Linda) and Sachdev (Harshpal Singh), “Maternal and Child Undernutrition: Consequences for Adult Health and Human Capital”, The Lancet, 371 (9609), 26 January 2008, pp. 340-357.
  • Warner (Marcella L.), Harley (Kim), Bradman (Asa), Vargas (Gloria) and Eskenazi (Brenda), “Soda Consumption and Overweight Status of 2-year-old Mexican-American Children in California”, Obesity, 14, 2006, pp. 1966-1974.
  • WHO, Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a WHO-FAO Expert Consultation, WHO TRS 916, Geneva, WHO, 2003.
  • WHO, European Charter on Counteracting Obesity. Diet and Physical Activity for Health. WHO European Ministerial Conference on Counteracting Obesity, EUR/06/5062700/8, 16 November 2006.
  • WHO, 2008-2013 Action Plan for the Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Geneva, WHO, 2009a.
  • WHO, Global Health Risks: Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risks, Geneva, WHO, 2009b.
  • WHO, Country Capacity for Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Control in the WHO European Region. Preliminary Report, Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2010.
  • WHO, Noncommunicable Diseases Country Profiles. WHO Global Report, Geneva, WHO, September 2011.
  • Yach (Derek), “Nutritional Change Is not a Simple Answer to Non-communicable Diseases”, British Medical Journal, 343 (7821), 3 September 2011, pp. 455-457.
  • Webography

Notes

  • [1]
    The Giessen Declaration was announced at the 18th International Congress of Nutrition, held in Durban (2005).
  • [2]
    Newsletter Sustainable Earth Alliance, 7, October 2010 (http://www.terre-citoyenne.org/en/des-ressources/newsletter/october-2010.html).
  • [3]
    Mediterranean Institute of Certification (IMC) (http://lnx.imcert.it/v3/index.php?&lan=en).
  • [4]
    Consorzio per la Ricerca e Formazione sulla Sicurezza Alimentare (RIFOSAL) (http://www.rifosal.net/)
  • [5]
    Ministry of Culture and Tourism of Turkey, The Turkish and Ottoman Cuisine,Vol. 1 and 2 (DVD).
  • [6]
    Università degli Studi di Scienze Gastronomiche (http://www.unisg.it).
  • [7]
    The term describes unusual situations that are not addressed in DE programmes, such as DE on balanced diets for families who live in poverty, have no access to fresh food or to cooking facilities, or balanced diets when eating canned food (Cruise and Ware, 2010).
  • [8]
    Director, Office of Global Affairs of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Sharing the Responsibility: Noncommunicable Diseases”, The Washington Post, 14 September 2011 (http://washingtonpostlive.com/conferences/ncds#).
bb.footer.alt.logo.cairn

Cairn.info, plateforme de référence pour les publications scientifiques francophones, vise à favoriser la découverte d’une recherche de qualité tout en cultivant l’indépendance et la diversité des acteurs de l’écosystème du savoir.

Avec le soutien de

Retrouvez Cairn.info sur

18.97.14.82

Accès institutions

Rechercher

Toutes les institutions