Notes

• [1]
  [Translator’s note: in English, these two notions are often subsumed under the related terms: “natural sciences” and “human sciences”.]
• [2]
  Assoun, P. L. (1981). Introduction à l’épistémologie freudienne, Paris: Payot & Rivages.
• [3]
  Translated into English as Dilthey, W. (1883). Introduction to the Human Sciences: An Attempt to Lay a Foundation for the Study of Society and History, translated (with an introductory essay) by R. J. Betanzos, Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1988.
• [4]
  Freud, S. (1961). “An Autobiographical Study” (1925), translated by A. Stachey & J. Strachey in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XX, Hogarth Press, London, p. 58.
• [5]
  Freud, S. (2002). Analysis Terminable and Interminable (1937), translated by J. Strachey, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XXIII, Hogarth Press, London, 1964, p. 225; retranslated by A. Bance in Wild Analysis, Penguin Modern Classics, London, p. 171-208.
• [6]
  Freud, S. (1991). The Interpretation of Dreams, (1900) in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. IV, Hogarth Press, London, 1953, p. 100; reprinted as Penguin Freud Library Vol. IV, The Penguin Press, Harmondsworth, p. 174.
• [7]
  Grünbaum, A. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis, a Philosophical Critique. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• [8]
  Simanke, R. T. (2011). Freudian Pscyhoanalysis as a Model for Overcoming the Duality between Natural Sciences and Human Sciences. In Krause, D., Passos Videira, A. A., et al., Brazilian Studies in Philosophy and History of Science: An Account of Recent Works, Netherlands: Springer Science, p. 211-221.
• [9]
  Freud, S. (1991). Instincts and their Vicissitudes (1915). Translated by C. M. Baines & J. Strachey, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV: On the History of the Psycho – Analytic Movement, Papers on Metapsychology, and Other Works, Hogarth Press, London, 1957, p. 109-40; reprinted in Penguin Freud Library Vol. XI: On Metapsychology, The Penguin Press, Harmondsworth, p. 106-38; retranslated by G. Frankland as “Drives and Their Fates” in The Unconscious, Penguin Modern Classics, London, 2005, p. 11-31.
• [10]
  Dorer, M. (1932). Historische Grundlagm der Psychanalyse, Leipzig: Felix Meiner.
• [11]
  One may note in Herbart’s work certain echos of the Freudian concepts of representation (Vorstellung), repression (Verdränung) and so on. On this subject, see Assoun (1981).
• [12]
  Binswanger, L. (1936). “Freud’s Conception of Man in the Light of Anthropology”, in Being-in-the-World: Selected Papers of Ludwig Binswanger, translated by J. Needleman, New York: Basic Books, 1963.
• [13]
  Hyppolite, J. (1955). Psychanalyse et Philosophie. Figures de la pensée philosophique. Paris: PUF, 1991.
• [14]
  Kandel, E. R. (1999). Biology and the future of psychoanalysis: a new intellectual framework for psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry, Issue 156, p. 505-24.
• [15]
  Nagel, E. (1959). Methodological issues in psychoanalytic theory: a Symposium. Nova Iorque: Sidney Hook.
• [16]
  Rapaport, D. (1958). The structure of psychoanalytic theory (a Systematizing attempt). Psychology, A Study of a Science, Vol. 3. New York: S. Koch.
• [17]
  Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Harper & Row.
• [18]
  A good example of the possibility of the character of refutability can be found in Freud (1915) “A Case of Paranoia Running Counter to the Psycho-Analytic Theory of the Disease”, translated by J. Strachey, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV: On the History of the Psycho – Analytic Movement, Papers on Metapsychology, and Other Works, Hogarth Press, London, 1957, p. 261-272.
• [19]
  Calazans, R. (2006). Psicanálise e ciência. Rio de Janeiro: Agora: Estudos em Teoria Psicanalítica, Vol. 9, No. 2, p. 273-283.
• [20]
  Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• [21]
  Biebel, D. (1999). Psicoanálisis y ciência. Aperturas psicoanalíticas, No. 2. Available at:
  http://www.aperturas.org/articulos.php?id=0000073&a=Psicoanalisis-y-ciencia
• [22]
  Chavarelli, M. (2003). Psicanálise e ciência. De que ciência estamos falando?. In Psicanálise ontem e hoje. São Paulo: Revista Brasileira de Psicanálise, Vol. 37, No. 4, p. 1035-1049.
• [23]
  Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.